Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Moonlight Graphix

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 217563 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$65,438.95
Client Filers
15
Payments
88
Activity Range
05/07/2021–06/13/2026
Largest Payment
$3,044.53
Graph: 15 connected filers · 88 payments · $65,438.95 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$12,230.101406/13/2026
2Restaurant & Beverage Alliance of Texas$10,408.411009/13/2024
3Hays County Democratic Party$8,369.631905/14/2026
4Lincoln-Goldfinch, Kate (Ms.)$6,379.99501/06/2026
5Economic Growth Committee$6,250.00609/06/2024
6Medina, Fred$5,845.50208/02/2024
7Brandon, Sarah K.$3,729.22802/19/2024
8Lerner, Robin J. (Mrs.)$3,417.61712/29/2025
9Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$2,776.62303/18/2026
10Hodges, Taren (Mrs.)$2,026.07502/26/2026
11Papari, Arshia N. (Mr.)$1,488.44104/28/2026
12Eckhardt, Sarah (The Honorable)$1,135.54112/05/2025
13Duval, Sally C. (Mrs.)$843.81305/14/2024
14Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$429.76305/28/2026
15Hays County Young Democrats$108.25110/20/2025

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
10 66.7% 1,669 0.6%
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
7 46.7% 592 1.2%
SCALE TO WIN
Vendor ID 276919
6 40.0% 113 4.9%
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
6 40.0% 253 2.3%
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
6 40.0% 620 1.0%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
6 40.0% 1,638 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
6 40.0% 3,017 0.2%
PRESTIGE PRINTING
Vendor ID 249363
5 33.3% 187 2.5%
NGP VAN
Vendor ID 225757
5 33.3% 252 1.9%
CANVA
Vendor ID 50709
5 33.3% 303 1.6%
ZOOM
Vendor ID 360954
5 33.3% 294 1.6%
MAILCHIMP
Vendor ID 200740
5 33.3% 486 1.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/13/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$977.50paper fans, table tents
05/28/2026Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$172.12campaign literature for Costilla, Bush, Gutierrez Cohen & Goodwin campaigns
05/26/2026Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$128.82campaign literature for Costilla, Bush, Gutierrez Cohen & Goodwin campaigns
05/21/2026Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$128.82campaign literature for Costilla, Bush, Gutierrez Cohen & Goodwin campaigns
05/20/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$1,916.03road signs, paper fans
05/17/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$351.81business cards, push cards
05/14/2026Hays County Democratic Party$51.96Printing expenses
04/28/2026Papari, Arshia N. (Mr.)$1,488.44Yard Signs
03/30/2026Hays County Democratic Party$87.68Printing charge
03/30/2026Hays County Democratic Party$81.19Printing charge
03/24/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$643.55business cards, push cards, stickers, banner
03/18/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$1,136.63T-shirts and buttons
03/03/2026Hays County Democratic Party$384.29Printing charges
02/27/2026Garibay, Montserrat (Mrs.)$135.31Stickers
02/26/2026Hodges, Taren (Mrs.)$291.19Campaign postcards and buttons
02/21/2026Hodges, Taren (Mrs.)$467.30Campaign postcards and buttons
02/19/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$135.31push cards
02/16/2026Hodges, Taren (Mrs.)$832.44Campaign postcards, buttons, and yard signs
02/05/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$92.01push cards
02/04/2026Hodges, Taren (Mrs.)$248.95Campaign postcards
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.