Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Organization
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 217188 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$370,617.93
Client Filers
22
Payments
865
Activity Range
09/28/2000–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$6,187.49
Graph: 22 connected filers · 865 payments · $370,617.93 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$335,469.7282506/30/2026
2Democratic Club of The Woodlands$6,687.49305/22/2025
3Plumbers Local #68 PAC$6,200.00910/13/2015
4Lone Star Democratic Club of Montgomery County$5,240.02512/15/2015
5Farouk for Governor Exploratory Committee$5,000.00110/30/2009
6Montgomery County Democratic Execuitive Committee$1,935.63212/17/2007
7Meyer, Marc M. (Mr.)$1,575.00203/12/2020
8Midler, Richard M. (Mr.)$1,570.00303/27/2024
9Bernsen, David E. (The Honorable)$1,000.00110/06/2000
10Fisher, David (Mr.)$1,000.00109/28/2000
11Stittleburg, Jason G. (Mr.)$999.23106/26/2024
12McGill, Lorena Perez (Ms.)$750.00112/08/2017
13Johnson, Kristin L.$750.00112/13/2021
14Alvarado, James F. (Mr.)$750.00112/03/2025
15King, Nicole S. (Mrs.)$750.00112/06/2025
16Progressive Democrats of Southeast Texas$300.00109/10/2012
17Hamrick Lewis, Amy E. (Ms.)$250.00101/08/2020
18Weems, Jeff (Mr.)$120.00110/07/2010
19Mabry, Bobby S. (Mr.)$118.10211/18/2022
20Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$75.00103/18/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
15 68.2% 1,669 0.9%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
12 54.5% 3,017 0.4%
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
9 40.9% 492 1.8%
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 163803
8 36.4% 39 15.1%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
7 31.8% 1,327 0.5%
ACT BLUE
Vendor ID 6259
6 27.3% 273 2.1%
JASON'S DELI
Vendor ID 162552
6 27.3% 649 0.9%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
6 27.3% 1,638 0.4%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
6 27.3% 1,536 0.4%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
6 27.3% 1,360 0.4%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
6 27.3% 1,958 0.3%
BRAZORIA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 41179
5 22.7% 60 6.5%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026ActBlue Texas$201.67POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/28/2026ActBlue Texas$507.06POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$1,322.12POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$758.73POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$696.27POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$532.99POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/24/2026ActBlue Texas$387.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/17/2026ActBlue Texas$407.19POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$657.87POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$773.07POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/26/2026ActBlue Texas$567.56POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$767.37POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$614.67POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026ActBlue Texas$1,484.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/31/2026ActBlue Texas$124.85POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/29/2026ActBlue Texas$489.75POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$2,755.30POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/15/2026ActBlue Texas$1,396.47POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/08/2026ActBlue Texas$633.86POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/01/2026ActBlue Texas$720.22POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.