Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

MILAM COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 214140 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$4,240.41
Client Filers
2
Payments
9
Activity Range
12/16/2011–10/13/2024
Largest Payment
$1,500.00
Graph: 2 connected filers · 9 payments · $4,240.41 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Lewis Jr., Hollis C. (Mr.)$3,400.00510/24/2012
2ActBlue Texas$840.41410/13/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
2 100.0% 1,669 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/13/2024ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
10/06/2024ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
09/29/2024ActBlue Texas$720.36POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
09/22/2024ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
10/24/2012Lewis Jr., Hollis C. (Mr.)$500.00mailing of campaign literature
09/10/2012Lewis Jr., Hollis C. (Mr.)$700.00share of mailing costs for candidates mailing
07/21/2012Lewis Jr., Hollis C. (Mr.)$200.00democratic candidates mailing
12/16/2011Lewis Jr., Hollis C. (Mr.)$1,500.00Filing Fee
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.