Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Mercury Campaigns

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 210285 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$33,234.15
Client Filers
6
Payments
26
Activity Range
08/22/2003–01/26/2005
Largest Payment
$4,625.00
Graph: 6 connected filers · 26 payments · $33,234.15 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Democratic Party$18,721.121211/17/2003
2Hopson R.Ph., Charles L. 'Chuck'$4,088.75406/01/2004
3Pickett, Joseph$3,666.00210/04/2004
4Sadler, Paul (Mr.)$3,500.00203/11/2004
5Committee to Elect David L. Farabee$2,858.28408/11/2004
6Practice What You Preach$400.00201/26/2005

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 150884
4 66.7% 122 3.2%
TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Vendor ID 312067
4 66.7% 388 1.0%
TIME WARNER CABLE
Vendor ID 328064
4 66.7% 390 1.0%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
4 66.7% 906 0.4%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
4 66.7% 946 0.4%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
4 66.7% 1,327 0.3%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
4 66.7% 1,360 0.3%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
4 66.7% 1,368 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
4 66.7% 3,017 0.1%
OPINION ANALYSTS INC.
Vendor ID 233567
3 50.0% 89 3.3%
HYATT
Vendor ID 154060
3 50.0% 90 3.2%
AUSTIN AMERICAN STATESMAN
Vendor ID 23153
3 50.0% 102 2.9%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
01/26/2005Practice What You Preach$200.00Invoice: online contribution setup
10/04/2004Pickett, Joseph$1,833.00Consulting
09/16/2004Pickett, Joseph$1,833.00info
08/11/2004Committee to Elect David L. Farabee$75.00Web Page Expense
06/16/2004Committee to Elect David L. Farabee$60.00Internet Site Expense
06/01/2004Hopson R.Ph., Charles L. 'Chuck'$120.00web-site hosting fee
05/12/2004Committee to Elect David L. Farabee$1,473.28Internet Site Expense
03/11/2004Sadler, Paul (Mr.)$500.00web
03/02/2004Hopson R.Ph., Charles L. 'Chuck'$1,468.75web-site consutling
02/19/2004Committee to Elect David L. Farabee$1,250.00Internet Design Expense
02/05/2004Hopson R.Ph., Charles L. 'Chuck'$1,250.00website hosting and design
02/05/2004Hopson R.Ph., Charles L. 'Chuck'$1,250.00website hosting and design
12/12/2003Sadler, Paul (Mr.)$3,000.00web design
11/17/2003Texas Democratic Party$811.50website maintenance
11/17/2003Texas Democratic Party$811.50website maintenance
10/29/2003Texas Democratic Party$1,082.50website maintenance
10/29/2003Texas Democratic Party$1,082.50website maintenance
09/26/2003Texas Democratic Party$1,217.81web development
09/26/2003Texas Democratic Party$1,217.81web development
09/26/2003Texas Democratic Party$1,082.50website maintenance
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.