Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Mammoth Marketing

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Media Advertising
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 201567 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$901,734.58
Client Filers
12
Payments
124
Activity Range
11/26/2014–12/01/2025
Largest Payment
$120,585.14
Graph: 12 connected filers · 124 payments · $901,734.58 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Republican Party of Texas$595,470.191710/25/2018
2DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$67,342.594612/01/2025
3Metcalf, William T. (The Honorable)$60,370.063001/17/2017
4Harris County GOP-PAC$50,000.00105/16/2022
5McWilliams, Tiffany N. (Mrs.)$44,875.531302/23/2024
6Preserve the Woodlands Candidate Committee$43,358.80610/31/2023
7Hayes, Philip B. (Mr.)$18,435.69602/10/2016
8Texas Alliance for Life$12,834.46102/01/2024
9Judge Chris Wolfe Campaign$3,268.47111/03/2020
10Porter, David J$2,906.68111/26/2014
11Burgess, Joshua T. (The Honorable)$2,500.00111/01/2020
12Hispanic Republicans of Texas$372.11111/02/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
10 83.3% 1,571 0.6%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
7 58.3% 1,174 0.6%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
7 58.3% 1,638 0.4%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
7 58.3% 1,958 0.4%
STARBUCKS
Vendor ID 294631
6 50.0% 690 0.9%
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
6 50.0% 734 0.8%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
6 50.0% 1,480 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
6 50.0% 3,017 0.2%
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
5 41.7% 355 1.4%
MINUTEMAN PRESS
Vendor ID 214994
5 41.7% 377 1.3%
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
5 41.7% 642 0.8%
CONSTANT CONTACT
Vendor ID 73952
5 41.7% 629 0.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/01/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$514.19Campaign Research
12/01/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$514.19Campaign Research
08/05/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$514.19Campaign Research
08/05/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$243.56Campaign Advertising
08/05/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$102.84Campaign Advertising
08/05/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$68.20Campaign Advertising
08/05/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$68.20Campaign Advertising
07/02/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$1,387.82Campaign Advertising
07/02/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$1,028.38Campaign Research
07/02/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$473.59Campaign Advertising
07/02/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$405.94Campaign Advertising
05/19/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$527.72Research Materials
05/19/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$102.84Campaign Advertising
05/19/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$61.70Campaign Advertising
05/19/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$61.70Campaign Advertising
04/02/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$1,055.44Research Materials
02/06/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$527.72Research Materials
02/06/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$67.66Campaign Advertising
01/24/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$1,007.81Campaign Advertising
01/24/2025DeAyala, Emilio F. (The Honorable)$243.56Campaign Advertising
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.