Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Reported Payee
Mail Max
Payee identity exactly as reported in Texas Ethics Commission expenditure records.
Reported Payments
$41,000.15
Reported Records
26
Reported Client Filers
4
Activity Range
07/16/2002–12/20/2006
Top Client Filers
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $25,686.40 | 19 | 11/01/2002 |
| 2 | Menard, Vicki L. | $9,924.03 | 3 | 12/20/2006 |
| 3 | DUNN, JAMES | $3,829.72 | 3 | 03/04/2004 |
| 4 | Cunningham, Jeff D. (Dr.) | $1,560.00 | 1 | 02/27/2004 |
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/20/2006 | Menard, Vicki | $4,631.20 | Campaign Mailing |
| 10/26/2006 | Menard, Vicki L. | $4,472.34 | Campaign Mailing |
| 06/12/2006 | Menard, Vicki L. | $820.49 | Advertising |
| 03/04/2004 | DUNN, JAMES | $1,914.86 | Political mailout |
| 03/04/2004 | DUNN, JAMES | $1,493.29 | Political mailout |
| 03/04/2004 | DUNN, JAMES | $421.57 | Political mailout |
| 02/27/2004 | Cunningham, Jeff D. (Dr.) | $1,560.00 | Postage |
| 11/01/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $510.00 | Mailing fees |
| 10/31/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $4,327.02 | Mailing services |
| 10/30/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $166.68 | Mailing services |
| 10/29/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $1,154.05 | Mailing Services |
| 10/23/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $1,112.74 | Mailing Fees |
| 10/21/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $4,372.72 | Mailing Fees |
| 10/17/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $983.33 | Mailing Fees |
| 10/16/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $931.53 | Mailing Fees |
| 10/15/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $4,056.42 | Mailing Fees |
| 10/08/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $904.04 | Mailing Fees |
| 10/04/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $644.00 | Mailing Services |
| 10/01/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $150.00 | Mailing Fees |
| 09/30/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $3,015.49 | Mailing Fees |
Evidence basis: No unique canonical vendor identity was resolved. This page therefore remains at the exact reported-payee level.