Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

MW & Associates

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 220469 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$627,479.15
Client Filers
6
Payments
60
Activity Range
03/09/2002–11/10/2010
Largest Payment
$55,810.60
Graph: 6 connected filers · 60 payments · $627,479.15 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$228,843.501611/10/2010
2Swinford, David A.$212,467.221603/01/2006
3Woodburn, Douglas (Mr.)$88,808.60503/10/2008
4Isern, Kevin (Mr.)$49,218.571311/08/2004
5Miner, Bruce (Mr.)$38,197.32603/25/2002
6Estevez, Ana (Ms.)$9,943.94401/10/2006

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
SIR SPEEDY
Vendor ID 285355
5 83.3% 111 4.5%
Amarillo Globe News
Vendor ID 13473
4 66.7% 24 15.4%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
4 66.7% 1,571 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
4 66.7% 3,017 0.1%
Accent West
Vendor ID 5598
3 50.0% 5 37.5%
Potter County Clerk
Vendor ID 248316
3 50.0% 7 30.0%
Amarillo Chamber Of Commerce
Vendor ID 13451
3 50.0% 13 18.8%
NoBox Creative
Vendor ID 226635
3 50.0% 16 15.8%
GEBO'S
Vendor ID 127092
3 50.0% 28 9.7%
LOWE'S
Vendor ID 196502
3 50.0% 734 0.4%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
3 50.0% 1,360 0.2%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
3 50.0% 1,876 0.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/10/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$6,134.13media production work photography print advertising outdoor billboards etc.
10/08/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$11,224.22online newspaper and radio advertising work and expense
09/13/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$121.78Welcome Pardner! direct mail insert art and ad work
09/01/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$4,134.08PR & Media Work Fundraiser Expense & Outdoor Advertising Expense
08/03/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$315.00advertising/consulting work
06/30/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$2,462.41campaign marketing expenses
05/28/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$4,726.82newspaper campaign online print items television
03/04/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$581.30advertising expenses and bumper stickers
02/26/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$25,896.76newspaper online outdoorprinting television & radio & campaign services
02/22/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$24,374.90newspaper online outdoorprinting television & radio & campaign services
02/22/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$10,900.00television & yard signs
02/09/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$20,520.50advertising expense(newspaper online outdoorprinting television & radio) & campaign services
01/27/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$31,691.00advertising expense (television & radio)
01/22/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$27,033.60advertising expense(newspaper online outdoorprinting television & radio) & campaign services
01/12/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$30,000.00campaign advertising (television & radio) - portion from contributions and portion from personal
01/12/2010Price IV, Walter T. (Mr.)$28,727.00campaign advertising (television & radio) - portion from contributions and portion from personal
03/10/2008Woodburn, Douglas (Mr.)$2,776.58Advertising\n
02/28/2008Woodburn, Douglas (Mr.)$14,957.34Advertising\n
02/13/2008Woodburn, Douglas (Mr.)$24,297.18Advertising\n
01/29/2008Woodburn, Douglas (Mr.)$32,000.00Advertising\n
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.