Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

M&M Graphics and Advertising

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 199137 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$89,567.91
Client Filers
2
Payments
33
Activity Range
01/28/2002–01/01/2005
Largest Payment
$7,338.27
Graph: 2 connected filers · 33 payments · $89,567.91 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$88,723.563201/01/2005
2Friends of Kyle Janek$844.35101/28/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
CAMPAIGN DATA SYSTEMS
Vendor ID 49066
2 100.0% 39 5.1%
CITGO
Vendor ID 64019
2 100.0% 68 2.9%
JOHN DONER & ASSOCIATES
Vendor ID 167701
2 100.0% 76 2.6%
VISION AMERICA
Vendor ID 345692
2 100.0% 102 2.0%
BOOKER INDUSTRIES
Vendor ID 38936
2 100.0% 186 1.1%
DIAMOND SHAMROCK
Vendor ID 90007
2 100.0% 197 1.0%
QUORUM REPORT
Vendor ID 253390
2 100.0% 197 1.0%
EXXONMOBIL
Vendor ID 108636
2 100.0% 232 0.9%
APPLE STORE
Vendor ID 18867
2 100.0% 237 0.8%
FEDERAL EXPRESS
Vendor ID 111418
2 100.0% 290 0.7%
TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION
Vendor ID 314702
2 100.0% 285 0.7%
SBC
Vendor ID 276810
2 100.0% 321 0.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
01/01/2005Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$1,504.68Direct mail
11/12/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$167.79Printing
10/29/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$319.34Printing
10/27/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$4,882.72Direct mail
10/26/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$6,837.34Direct mail
10/25/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$1,092.24Printing
10/25/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$232.74Printing
10/23/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$6,906.62Direct mail
10/18/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$368.05Printing
10/13/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$3,307.05Direct mail
10/12/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$6,945.59Direct mail
10/04/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$1,717.40Direct mail
10/01/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$7,214.24Direct mail
10/01/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$1,362.86Direct mail
09/28/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$3,429.59Direct mail
09/21/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$6,686.01Printing and direct mail
09/10/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$6,560.49Direct mail
09/10/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$2,038.82Direct mail
09/10/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$1,623.75Printing
08/20/2004Witt, Ann (Mrs.)$7,338.27Printing
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.