Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
M&M ADVERTISING
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 199117 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$20,879.90
Client Filers
7
Payments
20
Activity Range
10/04/1994–11/17/2025
Largest Payment
$2,760.00
Graph: 7 connected filers · 20 payments · $20,879.90 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- M&M ADVERTISING
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (The Honorable) | $13,061.98 | 10 | 12/01/2013 |
| 2 | Democratic Ellis County Campaign Committee | $2,760.00 | 1 | 08/07/2002 |
| 3 | Horn, Kerry (Mr.) | $2,038.57 | 1 | 09/29/2006 |
| 4 | Bedasa, Desiree M. | $1,519.35 | 2 | 11/17/2025 |
| 5 | Republican Party Of Ellis County, Local (CEC) | $1,050.00 | 2 | 10/04/2016 |
| 6 | Duncanville United | $375.00 | 3 | 03/09/2013 |
| 7 | RED OAK H.E.R.E: Hawks Expanding Resources for Everyone | $75.00 | 1 | 04/04/2022 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
|
5 | 71.4% | 898 | 0.6% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
4 | 57.1% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
|
3 | 42.9% | 785 | 0.4% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,445 | 0.2% |
|
Ennis Daily News
Vendor ID 104880
|
2 | 28.6% | 14 | 10.5% |
|
TXU
Vendor ID 336193
|
2 | 28.6% | 44 | 4.1% |
|
ELITE NEWS
Vendor ID 103191
|
2 | 28.6% | 91 | 2.1% |
|
7-11
Vendor ID 2438
|
2 | 28.6% | 96 | 2.0% |
|
SOUTHWESTERN BELL
Vendor ID 290073
|
2 | 28.6% | 238 | 0.8% |
|
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
|
2 | 28.6% | 564 | 0.4% |
|
FEDEX OFFICE
Vendor ID 111594
|
2 | 28.6% | 649 | 0.3% |
|
THE HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 320070
|
2 | 28.6% | 585 | 0.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2025 | Bedasa, Desiree M. | $419.35 | Billboard |
| 09/26/2025 | Bedasa, Desiree M. | $1,100.00 | Billboard |
| 04/04/2022 | RED OAK H.E.R.E: Hawks Expanding Resources for Everyone | $75.00 | billboard rental |
| 10/04/2016 | Republican Party Of Ellis County, Local (CEC) | $525.00 | Ovilla Rd Billboards |
| 12/01/2013 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Holiday Billboards |
| 03/09/2013 | Duncanville United | $125.00 | Billboard Rental |
| 02/11/2013 | Duncanville United | $125.00 | Billboard |
| 01/26/2013 | Duncanville United | $125.00 | Billboard Announcing Duncanville United |
| 10/30/2012 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (Ms.) | $1,000.00 | Billboards |
| 10/04/2012 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (Ms.) | $2,612.00 | Ads |
| 10/01/2012 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (Ms.) | $1,000.00 | Advertising |
| 07/09/2012 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (Ms.) | $1,150.00 | Billboard |
| 05/01/2012 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (Ms.) | $1,050.00 | Billboards |
| 03/14/2012 | Lister Brown, Phyllis (Ms.) | $1,299.99 | Billboards |
| 09/29/2006 | Horn, Kerry (Mr.) | $2,038.57 | ADVERTISING |
| 08/07/2002 | Democratic Ellis County Campaign Committee | $2,760.00 | Purchase Billboards |
| 10/04/1994 | Republican Party Of Ellis County, Local (CEC) | $525.00 | Ovilla Road Billboards |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.