Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
LOYD NEAL CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 196795 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$20,000.00
Client Filers
8
Payments
13
Activity Range
02/11/2003–12/22/2011
Largest Payment
$7,500.00
Graph: 8 connected filers · 13 payments · $20,000.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Loyd Neal Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Republican Party of Nueces County | $7,500.00 | 1 | 10/09/2006 |
| 2 | International Bank of Commerce Committee for the Improvement & Betterment of the Country | $3,000.00 | 3 | 08/21/2006 |
| 3 | Nueces County Republican Women PAC | $3,000.00 | 1 | 12/22/2011 |
| 4 | Republican Party of Texas | $2,700.00 | 3 | 10/07/2010 |
| 5 | VALERO POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | $2,000.00 | 1 | 02/26/2003 |
| 6 | Professionals PAC HDR Inc. | $800.00 | 2 | 04/02/2010 |
| 7 | EPAC | $500.00 | 1 | 08/31/2006 |
| 8 | Rock Engineering & Testing Lab. Inc. PAC | $500.00 | 1 | 03/31/2006 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BRENT CHESNEY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 41929
|
5 | 62.5% | 12 | 33.3% |
|
CONNIE SCOTT CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 73497
|
5 | 62.5% | 75 | 6.4% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,571 | 0.3% |
|
Jim Kaelin Campaign
Vendor ID 165359
|
4 | 50.0% | 5 | 44.4% |
|
MIKE PUSLEY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 213833
|
4 | 50.0% | 11 | 26.7% |
|
TEXANS FOR ELIZABETH AMES JONES
Vendor ID 308594
|
4 | 50.0% | 47 | 7.8% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF BEXAR COUNTY
Vendor ID 261713
|
4 | 50.0% | 173 | 2.3% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
4 | 50.0% | 325 | 1.2% |
|
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Vendor ID 157835
|
4 | 50.0% | 353 | 1.1% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
4 | 50.0% | 524 | 0.8% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,445 | 0.3% |
|
Jack Pulcher Campaign
Vendor ID 160699
|
3 | 37.5% | 3 | 37.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/22/2011 | Nueces County Republican Women PAC | $3,000.00 | Contribution made to political candidate for campaign expenses. |
| 10/07/2010 | Republican Party of Texas | $700.00 | Contribution |
| 08/20/2010 | Republican Party of Texas | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 07/29/2010 | Republican Party of Texas | $1,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 04/02/2010 | HDR Inc. PAC | $300.00 | Desc:Direct Contribution |
| 10/09/2006 | Republican Party of Nueces County | $7,500.00 | mailout-65 yr-mail vote |
| 09/08/2006 | Professionals PAC HDR Inc. | $500.00 | Desc:Direct Contribution |
| 08/31/2006 | EPAC | $500.00 | Contriibution to campaign |
| 08/21/2006 | International Bank of Commerce Committee Improvement and Betterment of the Country | $1,000.00 | contribution to Campaign |
| 03/31/2006 | Rock Engineering & Testing Lab. Inc. PAC | $500.00 | |
| 07/21/2005 | International Bank of Commerce Commitee Improvement and Betterment of the Country | $1,000.00 | campaign contribution |
| 02/26/2003 | VALERO POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE | $2,000.00 | CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/11/2003 | International Bank of Commerce Committee for the Improvement & Betterment of the Country | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.