Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Littlefield Consulting
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 192952 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$414,726.36
Client Filers
30
Payments
124
Activity Range
09/24/2004–02/25/2022
Largest Payment
$33,202.76
Graph: 30 connected filers · 124 payments · $414,726.36 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Littlefield Consulting
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WORLEY PRINTING
Vendor ID 357411
|
20 | 66.7% | 256 | 7.5% |
|
KELLY GRAPHICS
Vendor ID 176177
|
18 | 60.0% | 193 | 8.8% |
|
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
|
16 | 53.3% | 253 | 6.0% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
15 | 50.0% | 1,669 | 0.9% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
15 | 50.0% | 1,958 | 0.8% |
|
CHECKMARK TYPESETTING
Vendor ID 58877
|
14 | 46.7% | 151 | 8.4% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
14 | 46.7% | 3,017 | 0.5% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
13 | 43.3% | 1,480 | 0.9% |
|
CENTRAL MARKET
Vendor ID 56492
|
12 | 40.0% | 484 | 2.4% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
12 | 40.0% | 1,368 | 0.9% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
12 | 40.0% | 1,876 | 0.6% |
|
UNIVERSITY DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 338964
|
11 | 36.7% | 65 | 13.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/25/2022 | Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee | $5,375.00 | Dade Phelan - STATE HOUSE/021 Inkind expenditure for campaign field surverys |
| 11/09/2021 | Travis County Democratic Party | $15,613.91 | Voter outreach |
| 04/26/2021 | Homes Not Handcuffs | $15,277.44 | polling |
| 08/20/2020 | Eckhardt, Sarah | $2,500.00 | survey |
| 04/30/2019 | Cole, Sheryl N. (Mrs.) | $500.00 | General consulting |
| 01/03/2019 | Austinites for Affordability | $1,000.00 | General consulting |
| 12/14/2018 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee | $2,582.00 | Calls to PAC members |
| 12/04/2018 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee | $11,456.65 | Candidate GOTV calls |
| 12/03/2018 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee | $1,350.00 | District 8 polling for PAC |
| 11/05/2018 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee | $1,755.00 | Text messaging |
| 09/12/2018 | Cole, Sheryl N. (Mrs.) | $2,000.00 | Research |
| 03/13/2018 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | PAC research consulting |
| 01/09/2018 | Committee for Austin's Children | $3,686.72 | loan repayment |
| 01/04/2018 | Bucy III, John H. (Mr.) | $1,200.00 | Research |
| 11/09/2017 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee-N | $2,500.00 | PAC codenext consulting |
| 11/03/2017 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee-N | $3,666.00 | PAC direct mail for AISD Bond |
| 10/17/2017 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee-N | $2,500.00 | PAC research consulting |
| 09/29/2017 | Committee for Austin's Children | $4,000.00 | loan repayment |
| 09/07/2017 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee-N | $2,500.00 | PAC research consulting |
| 08/09/2017 | Austin Board of REALTORS Political Action Committee-N | $2,500.00 | PAC research consulting |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.