Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Linode.com

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 192355 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$963.54
Client Filers
2
Payments
6
Activity Range
03/08/2012–04/03/2017
Largest Payment
$230.22
Graph: 2 connected filers · 6 payments · $963.54 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Stop The Magnet$877.14404/03/2017
2Texas Democratic Party$86.40201/04/2017

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
FACEBOOK.COM
Vendor ID 109285
2 100.0% 103 1.9%
T-MOBILE
Vendor ID 302654
2 100.0% 180 1.1%
THE UPS STORE
Vendor ID 325288
2 100.0% 477 0.4%
GODADDY.COM
Vendor ID 130520
2 100.0% 652 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
04/03/2017Stop The Magnet$216.00Advertising
01/04/2017Texas Democratic Party$28.80Website hosting for tool
12/22/2015Texas Democratic Party$57.60Website maintenance
04/10/2015Stop The Magnet$215.46Advertising
04/02/2013Stop The Magnet$215.46Mailout
03/08/2012Stop The Magnet$230.22Website
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.