Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
LILY & COMPANY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 191703 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$31,648.71
Client Filers
3
Payments
23
Activity Range
01/27/2010–10/11/2018
Largest Payment
$3,250.44
Graph: 3 connected filers · 23 payments · $31,648.71 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Lily & Company
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROSE, JEFF | $25,985.57 | 21 | 11/05/2010 |
| 2 | KEFFER, JAMES | $3,250.44 | 1 | 12/15/2014 |
| 3 | Koop, Linda L. (The Honorable) | $2,412.70 | 1 | 10/11/2018 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BUC-EE'S
Vendor ID 44397
|
3 | 100.0% | 294 | 1.0% |
|
MICHAELS
Vendor ID 212366
|
3 | 100.0% | 366 | 0.8% |
|
THE UPS STORE
Vendor ID 325288
|
3 | 100.0% | 477 | 0.6% |
|
FEDEX OFFICE
Vendor ID 111594
|
3 | 100.0% | 649 | 0.5% |
|
TEXAS FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 311375
|
3 | 100.0% | 584 | 0.5% |
|
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
|
3 | 100.0% | 677 | 0.4% |
|
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
|
3 | 100.0% | 1,174 | 0.3% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
3 | 100.0% | 1,077 | 0.3% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
3 | 100.0% | 1,958 | 0.2% |
|
FLAG SALES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Vendor ID 114153
|
2 | 66.7% | 3 | 50.0% |
|
EL RESTAURANT AZTECA
Vendor ID 101939
|
2 | 66.7% | 8 | 22.2% |
|
McBrides
Vendor ID 207439
|
2 | 66.7% | 12 | 15.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2018 | Koop, Linda L. (The Honorable) | $2,412.70 | September Retainer and graphic design |
| 12/15/2014 | KEFFER, JAMES | $3,250.44 | fundraising expense |
| 11/05/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,500.00 | fundraising consultants |
| 10/22/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,500.00 | fundraising consultant |
| 10/22/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $241.96 | invitations and host board for fundraiser |
| 10/22/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $222.31 | postage for invitations and thank yous |
| 09/23/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,500.00 | fundraising consultant |
| 08/31/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,500.00 | fundraising consultant |
| 08/31/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $117.64 | PO Box rental and shipping expenses |
| 08/31/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $15.20 | copies and name tags |
| 07/23/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $2,571.52 | invitations thank you name tags for fundraising events |
| 07/23/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,500.00 | fundraising consultant |
| 07/23/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,231.49 | Food and beverage for fund raising events |
| 07/23/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $270.63 | valet services at fundraising events |
| 06/07/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $3,218.66 | consulting fees graphic design costs and printing and mail cost for direct mailer |
| 05/07/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,529.50 | consulting fees copies and parking expense reimbursement |
| 05/05/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,508.00 | consulting fees and copies |
| 03/02/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $2,003.12 | consulting fees signage and food for 2/10 fundraiser |
| 03/01/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $2,091.27 | consulting fees and printing for letterhead business cards and event invitations |
| 01/27/2010 | ROSE, JEFF | $1,500.00 | consulting fees |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.