Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
LARRY TAYLOR CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 187090 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$804,024.15
Client Filers
155
Payments
515
Activity Range
01/15/2002–11/10/2021
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 155 connected filers · 515 payments · $804,024.15 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Larry Taylor Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
112 | 72.3% | 325 | 30.4% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
112 | 72.3% | 325 | 30.4% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
111 | 71.6% | 268 | 35.6% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
105 | 67.7% | 227 | 37.9% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
104 | 67.1% | 289 | 30.6% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
104 | 67.1% | 524 | 18.1% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
103 | 66.5% | 295 | 29.7% |
|
ROBERT NICHOLS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 266292
|
100 | 64.5% | 197 | 39.7% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
100 | 64.5% | 253 | 32.5% |
|
LOIS KOLKHORST CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 194006
|
98 | 63.2% | 209 | 36.8% |
|
JOSE MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169533
|
98 | 63.2% | 222 | 35.1% |
|
JOHN WHITMIRE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168462
|
98 | 63.2% | 235 | 33.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.