Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
LACEY HULL CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 184870 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$1,790,925.24
Client Filers
79
Payments
213
Activity Range
11/13/2019–05/14/2026
Largest Payment
$250,000.00
Graph: 79 connected filers · 213 payments · $1,790,925.24 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Lacey Hull Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STEPHANIE KLICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 296102
|
51 | 64.6% | 175 | 25.1% |
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
48 | 60.8% | 239 | 17.8% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
48 | 60.8% | 524 | 8.6% |
|
JARED PATTERSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 162294
|
46 | 58.2% | 156 | 24.3% |
|
DADE PHELAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 81860
|
46 | 58.2% | 219 | 18.3% |
|
JEFF LEACH CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 163617
|
45 | 57.0% | 198 | 19.4% |
|
JACEY JETTON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 160410
|
44 | 55.7% | 97 | 33.3% |
|
GIOVANNI CAPRIGLIONE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 129221
|
44 | 55.7% | 196 | 19.0% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
44 | 55.7% | 325 | 12.2% |
|
SAM HARLESS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 273376
|
43 | 54.4% | 134 | 25.3% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
43 | 54.4% | 253 | 14.9% |
|
MIKE SCHOFIELD CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 213881
|
42 | 53.2% | 133 | 24.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/12/2026 | Texas Dental Association Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 08/11/2026 | HS LAW PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 08/11/2026 | Houston Police Officers Union PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 08/06/2026 | Texas Apartment Assn. PAC | $1,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 05/14/2026 | Cattle Raisers State PAC | $1,500.00 | Support for Texas House |
| 05/05/2026 | Houston Region Business Coalition | $10,000.00 | PAC Donation. |
| 05/04/2026 | Focused Advocacy Political Action Committee (PAC) | $1,000.00 | Contribution HD 138 |
| 02/24/2026 | Texas Society Of Certified Public Accountants PAC | $500.00 | Contribution |
| 02/11/2026 | Empower Pharma LLC PAC | $2,500.00 | CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/10/2026 | Texas Dental Association Political Action Committee | $750.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 02/04/2026 | Texas Leads PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 02/02/2026 | Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. Texas Political Action Committee | $5,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 02/02/2026 | Texas Society Of Anesthesiologists Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 01/28/2026 | Texas Sands PAC | $25,000.00 | Campaign donation |
| 01/28/2026 | Texas Sands PAC | $4,500.00 | Campaign donation |
| 01/23/2026 | Texas House Republican Caucus PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 01/23/2026 | Touchstone Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Political contribution to campaign fund. |
| 01/23/2026 | The Political Action Committee of the Texas Hospital Association | $2,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 01/22/2026 | Texas Optometric PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign Contributions |
| 01/22/2026 | Texas Consumer Lenders PAC | $1,000.00 | Political Contributions |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.