Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

LOCKART ATCHLEY & ASSOC.

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 193625 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$83,952.77
Client Filers
4
Payments
34
Activity Range
01/29/2000–12/31/2002
Largest Payment
$6,849.50
Graph: 4 connected filers · 34 payments · $83,952.77 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$38,172.411308/22/2002
2Texans For Justice Rodriguez$35,945.711412/31/2002
3GONZALES, AL$8,142.98206/23/2000
4HANKINSON, DEBORAH G.$1,691.67506/26/2000

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
Vendor ID 290110
4 100.0% 101 4.0%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
4 100.0% 906 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
4 100.0% 3,017 0.1%
TEXAS BAR JOURNAL
Vendor ID 309784
3 75.0% 13 21.4%
SCHOLZ GARDEN
Vendor ID 277338
3 75.0% 25 11.5%
AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE
Vendor ID 14902
3 75.0% 48 6.1%
CINGULAR WIRELESS
Vendor ID 63311
3 75.0% 225 1.3%
CAPITOL GRILL
Vendor ID 51404
3 75.0% 277 1.1%
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Vendor ID 157835
3 75.0% 353 0.8%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
3 75.0% 1,077 0.3%
CC's Coffee House
Vendor ID 55242
2 50.0% 3 40.0%
GATE 9 FOOD COURT
Vendor ID 126596
2 50.0% 3 40.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/31/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$543.05Accounting Services
09/23/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$859.91Accounting Services
08/22/2002Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$2,255.66Accounting Services
06/28/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$1,366.50Accounting Services
06/27/2002Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$1,295.25Accounting Services
06/14/2002Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$864.58Accounting Services
06/14/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$719.50Accounting Services
05/03/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$1,094.75Accounting Services
05/02/2002Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$4,509.89Accounting Services
03/27/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$4,383.50Accounting Services
03/23/2002Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$3,843.53Accounting Services
03/07/2002Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$5,174.94Accounting Services
03/02/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$5,659.00Accounting Services
02/06/2002Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$6,849.50Accounting Services
01/31/2002Texans For Justice Rodriguez$5,514.00Accounting Services
12/28/2001Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$1,766.00Accounting Services
12/21/2001Texans For Justice Rodriguez$5,092.25Professional Services - Accounting
11/16/2001Texans For Justice Rodriguez$2,178.25Professional Services - Accounting
11/14/2001Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$1,863.75Accounting Services
10/24/2001Judge Elizabeth Ray for Texas Supreme Court$435.00Accounting Services
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.