Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
LEON STRATEGIES
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 190106 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$2,388,914.07
Client Filers
22
Payments
401
Activity Range
02/16/2023–06/04/2026
Largest Payment
$79,017.58
Graph: 22 connected filers · 401 payments · $2,388,914.07 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- LEON STRATEGIES
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KAP PRINT
Vendor ID 174091
|
14 | 63.6% | 36 | 31.8% |
|
GO Creative Group
Vendor ID 130278
|
10 | 45.5% | 41 | 18.9% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
7 | 31.8% | 1,958 | 0.4% |
|
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
|
6 | 27.3% | 1,174 | 0.5% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
6 | 27.3% | 1,571 | 0.4% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
6 | 27.3% | 1,445 | 0.4% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
6 | 27.3% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
Norfleet Strategies
Vendor ID 226939
|
5 | 22.7% | 55 | 6.9% |
|
Ragnar Research Partners
Vendor ID 254461
|
5 | 22.7% | 93 | 4.5% |
|
THE AUSTIN CLUB
Vendor ID 315980
|
5 | 22.7% | 197 | 2.3% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
|
5 | 22.7% | 457 | 1.1% |
|
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
|
5 | 22.7% | 642 | 0.8% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/04/2026 | Lopez, Janie (The Honorable) | $3,000.00 | Campaign Consulting Fee |
| 06/01/2026 | Coastal Bend Coalition | $5,000.00 | Consulting Services 2026 June |
| 05/26/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,384.00 | mailer |
| 05/26/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,384.00 | mailer |
| 05/26/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,384.00 | mailer |
| 05/26/2026 | Sanchez, Sergio (Mr.) | $1,625.40 | Design and Distribution of Digital Campaign Messages |
| 05/22/2026 | Sanchez, Sergio (Mr.) | $4,461.95 | Design, Data, Postage and Production for Campaign Mail Advertisements |
| 05/21/2026 | Sanchez, Sergio (Mr.) | $8,139.00 | Design and Placement of Digital Campaign Advertisements |
| 05/19/2026 | Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund | $15,675.21 | Campaign Mailers |
| 05/19/2026 | Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund | $5,000.00 | Campaign Digital Advertising |
| 05/19/2026 | Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund | $3,662.96 | Campaign Text Messaging |
| 05/18/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,541.25 | Digital Advertising |
| 05/18/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,541.25 | Digital Advertising |
| 05/18/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,541.25 | Digital Advertising |
| 05/18/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,183.91 | Mailer |
| 05/18/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,183.91 | Mailer |
| 05/18/2026 | Peterson, Kelly G. (Ms.) | $7,183.91 | Mailer |
| 05/18/2026 | Sanchez, Sergio (Mr.) | $4,461.95 | Design, Data, Postage and Production for Campaign Mail Advertisements |
| 05/14/2026 | Sanchez, Sergio (Mr.) | $4,461.95 | Design, Data, Postage and Production for Campaign Mail Advertisements |
| 05/13/2026 | Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund | $15,648.91 | Campaign Mailers |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.