Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Kissidry Communications

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 179641 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$93,747.88
Client Filers
27
Payments
58
Activity Range
09/25/2015–09/04/2023
Largest Payment
$6,925.00
Graph: 27 connected filers · 58 payments · $93,747.88 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Citizens for Collin College$13,808.28407/10/2017
2Magnolia I.S.D. 2015 Bond$10,906.20410/23/2015
3Friends of Barbers Hill ISD$8,548.75204/29/2020
4COMPAC$6,359.68310/16/2018
5Say YES for CFISD Kids$5,856.00305/01/2019
6Community for Tomball ISD Students$5,033.63311/06/2017
7Back the Bond 2016$4,989.76412/29/2016
8Vote YES! for CCISD$3,953.75106/06/2017
9Galveston RISE$3,000.00104/24/2018
10BISD Backers$2,949.82210/17/2018
11Back the Nac!$2,895.69412/21/2018
12Community For Conroe ISD's Future$2,800.33203/31/2020
13Van-tastically Voting for VVISD!$2,760.38210/31/2017
14Judson Community Action Committee$2,692.04404/28/2016
15Invest in West$2,559.00104/22/2018
16Success for Santa Fe Schools$2,551.44512/21/2016
17Friends of Goose Creek Schools 2019 Bond$2,500.00103/22/2019
18Classrooms for CISD Kids$2,435.63109/25/2015
19Angleton ISD Advocates$2,000.00110/22/2019
20Stand Up for Snook$1,732.00104/26/2018

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
22 81.5% 1,638 1.3%
PostNet Tomball
Vendor ID 248199
9 33.3% 13 29.0%
Decisive Campaigns
Vendor ID 86866
9 33.3% 33 17.6%
ABI Digital Solutions
Vendor ID 4932
5 18.5% 8 16.7%
RIchmond Printing
Vendor ID 263884
5 18.5% 12 14.7%
THE SIGN SHOP
Vendor ID 324251
4 14.8% 31 7.4%
Jack Nadel Enterprises
Vendor ID 160678
3 11.1% 4 10.7%
ARC Document Solutions
Vendor ID 19378
3 11.1% 7 9.7%
GALVESTON COUNTY DAILY NEWS
Vendor ID 125411
3 11.1% 41 4.6%
COMMUNITY IMPACT NEWSPAPER
Vendor ID 72425
3 11.1% 53 3.9%
FASTSIGNS
Vendor ID 110921
3 11.1% 232 1.2%
MINUTEMAN PRESS
Vendor ID 214994
3 11.1% 377 0.7%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
09/04/2023Aldine ISD Advocates$250.00Email, website domain, hosting
06/30/2020Bryan ISD Bond Backers$125.00Web services
04/29/2020Friends of Barbers Hill ISD$6,925.00Mailer, Facebook advertising
04/14/2020Make More Room For Our Kids$150.00Web services
03/31/2020Community For Conroe ISD's Future$300.33Website renewal
03/27/2020Community for Friendswood ISD$125.00Web services
10/22/2019Angleton ISD Advocates$2,000.00Web services
05/01/2019Say YES for CFISD Kids$2,556.00Web Services
03/22/2019Friends of Goose Creek Schools 2019 Bond$2,500.00Web services
03/18/2019Community For Conroe ISD's Future$2,500.00Web services
03/14/2019Say YES for CFISD Kids$3,000.00Web Services
03/14/2019Say YES for CFISD Kids$300.00Flyer Design
12/21/2018Back the Nac!$162.38Email blast services
12/21/2018Back the Nac!$56.81Push cards
11/21/2018Back the Nac!$511.50Push cards, flyers and posters
11/06/2018KIDS Campaign$1,000.00 Social Media advertising
10/27/2018Back the Nac!$2,165.00Web services
10/17/2018BISD Backers$2,706.25Web services
10/17/2018BISD Backers$243.57Push cards, e-blast services
10/16/2018COMPAC$243.56Push cards and posters
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.