Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Kight Printing

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 178210 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$310,653.95
Client Filers
7
Payments
122
Activity Range
05/10/2000–08/05/2009
Largest Payment
$21,781.48
Graph: 7 connected filers · 122 payments · $310,653.95 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Wong, Martha$272,095.767211/10/2006
2Bohac, Dwayne$22,453.273108/05/2009
3Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.)$5,817.89607/09/2006
4Harris County Republican Party$4,533.77210/05/2000
5Spivey, Sylvia (Mrs.)$2,543.90411/01/2006
6Craft, Mary$2,025.77111/13/2001
7Woolley, Beverly$1,183.59601/04/2005

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
6 85.7% 457 1.3%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
6 85.7% 1,571 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
6 85.7% 3,017 0.2%
SK Strategies
Vendor ID 285620
5 71.4% 7 55.6%
WALDEN & ASSOCIATES
Vendor ID 347745
5 71.4% 33 14.3%
SBC
Vendor ID 276810
5 71.4% 321 1.5%
POSTMASTER
Vendor ID 248097
5 71.4% 471 1.1%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
5 71.4% 906 0.6%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
5 71.4% 785 0.6%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
5 71.4% 1,077 0.5%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
5 71.4% 1,174 0.4%
International Mailing Systems
Vendor ID 157967
4 57.1% 19 18.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
08/05/2009Bohac, Dwayne$61.61Printing Expense
06/29/2009Bohac, Dwayne$550.00Printing Expense
04/29/2008Bohac, Dwayne$569.20Marketing Materials
09/14/2007Bohac, Dwayne$402.39Printing Expense
03/14/2007Bohac, Dwayne$720.23Printing expense
11/10/2006Wong, Martha$4,630.75Campaign materials event postcards invitations envelopes cards
11/01/2006Spivey, Sylvia (Mrs.)$2,200.18Printing/Graphics Services
10/10/2006Bohac, Dwayne$342.09Printing Expense
09/28/2006Wong, Martha$1,683.16Campaign materials & ad design
09/19/2006Bohac, Dwayne$1,162.87Printing
09/12/2006Wong, Martha$3,236.67Campaign materials invitations cards envelopes
09/06/2006Wong, Martha$5,504.56Campaign materials event postcards invitations envelopes cards
08/23/2006Bohac, Dwayne$2,339.22Printing
08/23/2006Wong, Martha$858.68Campaign materials - event postcards
08/21/2006Wong, Martha$1,796.43Campaign materials - postcards envelopes & letters
08/10/2006Spivey, Sylvia (Mrs.)$132.63Printing/Graphics Services
08/10/2006Spivey, Sylvia (Mrs.)$48.71Printing/Graphics Services
07/27/2006Wong, Martha$220.57Campaign materials postcards
07/20/2006Wong, Martha$1,691.88Campaign invitations cards envelopes.
07/13/2006Bohac, Dwayne$296.29Printing
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.