Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
KERR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 177259 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$112,644.97
Client Filers
7
Payments
456
Activity Range
09/30/2009–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$1,827.33
Graph: 7 connected filers · 456 payments · $112,644.97 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Kerr County Democratic Party
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ActBlue Texas | $105,666.22 | 411 | 06/30/2026 |
| 2 | Kerr County Area Chapter of Texas Democratic Women | $4,681.00 | 30 | 05/03/2019 |
| 3 | Martinez, Rebeca C. (The Honorable) | $800.00 | 2 | 10/06/2019 |
| 4 | Gillespie County Democratic Party | $767.75 | 4 | 02/21/2024 |
| 5 | Ertel, Stephanie L. (Ms.) | $550.00 | 6 | 02/07/2018 |
| 6 | Rodriguez, Liza A. (Ms.) | $100.00 | 1 | 09/05/2018 |
| 7 | Alvarez, Patricia O. (The Honorable) | $80.00 | 2 | 06/14/2017 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
7 | 100.0% | 1,669 | 0.4% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
5 | 71.4% | 1,638 | 0.3% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
5 | 71.4% | 1,480 | 0.3% |
|
BEXAR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 33267
|
4 | 57.1% | 184 | 2.1% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
4 | 57.1% | 1,327 | 0.3% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
4 | 57.1% | 1,876 | 0.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
4 | 57.1% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
BOERNE AREA DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 38420
|
3 | 42.9% | 6 | 30.0% |
|
GUADALUPE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CLUB
Vendor ID 136361
|
3 | 42.9% | 9 | 23.1% |
|
WEBB COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 350342
|
3 | 42.9% | 31 | 8.6% |
|
North East Bexar County Democrats
Vendor ID 227279
|
3 | 42.9% | 51 | 5.5% |
|
BEXAR COUNTY YOUNG DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 33448
|
3 | 42.9% | 54 | 5.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $19.21 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/28/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $163.27 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/21/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $172.85 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/14/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $96.04 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/07/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $158.47 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/31/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $86.43 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/24/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $86.41 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/17/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $134.46 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/10/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $254.52 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/03/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $163.28 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/26/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $153.63 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/19/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $134.46 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/12/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $158.47 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/05/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $144.07 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/29/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $67.22 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $172.85 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/15/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $192.09 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/08/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $110.45 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/01/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $230.50 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $172.85 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.