Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Kelly Hancock Campaign Committee

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 176187 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$220,500.00
Client Filers
3
Payments
27
Activity Range
11/08/2007–06/25/2025
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 3 connected filers · 27 payments · $220,500.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$140,000.001506/25/2025
2PSEL PAC$80,000.001101/21/2022
3K-PAC$500.00111/08/2007

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Andy Nguyen Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 16926
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Bill Harris Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 34641
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Bill Meier Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 34733
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Bob McCoy Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 37989
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Bob McGrath Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 37991
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Bobby McGee Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 38251
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Cary Moon Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 53510
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
David Evans Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 85134
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
David Medina Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 85383
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Dee Anderson Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 86942
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Dionne Bagsby Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 91076
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Don Cosby Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 93026
3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/25/2025Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$25,000.00 Political contribution
10/02/2023Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$10,000.00 Political contribution
01/21/2022Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$5,000.00 Political contribution
01/21/2022PSEL PAC$5,000.00 Political contribution
09/26/2019Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$10,000.00Contribution
09/26/2019PSEL PAC$10,000.00Political contribution
06/21/2018Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$5,000.00Political contribution
06/21/2018PSEL PAC$5,000.00 Political contribution
09/19/2017Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$10,000.00Political contribution
09/19/2017PSEL PAC$10,000.00Political contribution
08/30/2016Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$10,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas Senate
08/30/2016PSEL PAC$10,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas Senate
06/26/2015PSEL PAC$10,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Senate
06/26/2015Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$10,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Senate
07/28/2014Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$10,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas Senate District 9
09/10/2013PSEL PAC$5,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas State Senate District 9
09/10/2013Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$5,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas State Senate District 9
06/27/2012PSEL PAC$5,000.00Contribution toward candidacy for Texas Senate
06/27/2012Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$5,000.00Contribution toward candidacy for Texas Senate
11/08/2007K-PAC$500.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas House of Representatives District 91
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.