Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

KAUFMAN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 175104 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$18,284.58
Client Filers
5
Payments
250
Activity Range
10/22/2002–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$3,000.00
Graph: 5 connected filers · 250 payments · $18,284.58 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$12,114.4224506/30/2026
2Cain, David H.$3,000.00111/12/2002
3Head, John M. (Mr.)$1,800.00210/22/2002
4Parnell, Joe$1,350.16110/23/2004
5Chae, Don (Dr.)$20.00109/06/2008

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
4 80.0% 1,669 0.2%
KAUFMAN HERALD
Vendor ID 175151
3 60.0% 21 13.0%
TERRELL TRIBUNE
Vendor ID 307513
3 60.0% 24 11.5%
DALLAS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 82606
3 60.0% 304 1.0%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
3 60.0% 3,017 0.1%
WOOD COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 356744
2 40.0% 3 33.3%
GRAYSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 133722
2 40.0% 5 25.0%
HUNT COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 153633
2 40.0% 6 22.2%
ROCKWALL COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 267239
2 40.0% 11 14.3%
KAUFMAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 175079
2 40.0% 15 11.1%
FORNEY MESSENGER
Vendor ID 116008
2 40.0% 16 10.5%
OPINION ANALYSTS INC.
Vendor ID 233567
2 40.0% 89 2.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026ActBlue Texas$4.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$48.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$76.83POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$86.44POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$4.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/24/2026ActBlue Texas$57.62POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/17/2026ActBlue Texas$43.21POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$124.86POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$4.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/26/2026ActBlue Texas$33.61POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$14.40POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$153.67POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/31/2026ActBlue Texas$4.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/29/2026ActBlue Texas$167.12POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$52.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/15/2026ActBlue Texas$86.43POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/08/2026ActBlue Texas$76.84POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/22/2026ActBlue Texas$52.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/15/2026ActBlue Texas$100.84POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/08/2026ActBlue Texas$76.84POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.