Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
KSHN RADIO
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 181843 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$23,789.00
Client Filers
9
Payments
31
Activity Range
11/01/2000–01/18/2018
Largest Payment
$1,680.00
Graph: 9 connected filers · 31 payments · $23,789.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- KSHN Radio
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cain III, Chap B. (Mr.) | $5,905.00 | 5 | 01/02/2018 |
| 2 | Otto, John | $5,382.00 | 12 | 02/07/2014 |
| 3 | Hight, C.T. (Mr.) | $4,620.00 | 3 | 09/24/2010 |
| 4 | Ellis, Daniel P. (Mr.) | $2,780.00 | 4 | 01/27/2004 |
| 5 | Shauberger, Edward R. (Mr.) | $2,180.00 | 2 | 10/15/2002 |
| 6 | Bradley, J. David (The Honorable) | $1,456.00 | 2 | 02/24/2014 |
| 7 | Hinch, Wesley N. (Mr.) | $594.00 | 1 | 02/16/2016 |
| 8 | Range, Richard L. (Mr.) | $540.00 | 1 | 01/18/2018 |
| 9 | foster, arlan (Mr.) | $332.00 | 1 | 10/23/2008 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
6 | 66.7% | 1,876 | 0.3% |
|
CLEVELAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 67373
|
5 | 55.6% | 9 | 38.5% |
|
THE VINDICATOR
Vendor ID 325554
|
5 | 55.6% | 19 | 21.7% |
|
CLEVELAND ADVOCATE
Vendor ID 67369
|
4 | 44.4% | 8 | 30.8% |
|
DAYTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 86099
|
4 | 44.4% | 10 | 26.7% |
|
TRINITY VALLEY EXPOSITION
Vendor ID 333694
|
4 | 44.4% | 12 | 23.5% |
|
LIBERTY COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 191047
|
4 | 44.4% | 23 | 14.3% |
|
SOILEAU PRINTING
Vendor ID 287441
|
4 | 44.4% | 54 | 6.8% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
4 | 44.4% | 1,571 | 0.3% |
|
City of Dayton
Vendor ID 65288
|
3 | 33.3% | 4 | 30.0% |
|
Dayton FFA
Vendor ID 86101
|
3 | 33.3% | 4 | 30.0% |
|
LIBERTY ROTARY CLUB
Vendor ID 191179
|
3 | 33.3% | 4 | 30.0% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2018 | Range, Richard L. (Mr.) | $540.00 | Radio Ad |
| 01/02/2018 | Cain III, Chap B. (Mr.) | $1,400.00 | CAMPAIGN RADIO ADS |
| 12/13/2017 | Cain III, Chap B. (Mr.) | $1,500.00 | RADIO ADVERTISING |
| 02/16/2016 | Hinch, Wesley N. (Mr.) | $594.00 | campaign radio ad |
| 02/24/2014 | Bradley, J. David | $416.00 | Radio ad |
| 02/20/2014 | Bradley, J. David (The Honorable) | $1,040.00 | Radio ad |
| 02/07/2014 | Otto, John | $1,680.00 | Campaign radio ad |
| 05/09/2012 | Otto, John | $720.00 | Radio ads for Warren Chisum Campaign |
| 05/09/2012 | Otto, John | $720.00 | Radio ads during early voting |
| 09/24/2010 | Hight, C.T. (Mr.) | $1,540.00 | political advertising |
| 09/24/2010 | Hight, C. T. (The Honorable) | $1,540.00 | ADVERTISEMENTS |
| 02/25/2010 | Cain III, Chap B. (Mr.) | $605.00 | ADVERTISING EXPENSE |
| 02/17/2010 | Cain III, Chap B. (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | ADVERTISING EXPENSE |
| 10/29/2008 | Otto, John | $432.00 | Advertising |
| 10/29/2008 | Otto, John | $432.00 | Advertising |
| 10/23/2008 | foster, arlan (Mr.) | $332.00 | advertising |
| 10/29/2004 | Otto, John | $60.00 | Advertising |
| 10/27/2004 | Otto, John | $240.00 | Advertising |
| 10/27/2004 | Otto, John | $240.00 | Advertising |
| 10/19/2004 | Otto, John | $360.00 | Advertising |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.