Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Johnson Campaigns
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 168790 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$180,895.62
Client Filers
8
Payments
17
Activity Range
08/09/2006–11/17/2023
Largest Payment
$74,660.43
Graph: 8 connected filers · 17 payments · $180,895.62 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Johnson Campaigns
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston Police Officers Union PAC | $104,423.69 | 3 | 11/17/2023 |
| 2 | Bailey, Kevin (Mr.) | $39,374.12 | 4 | 03/01/2008 |
| 3 | Harris County Tejano Democrats | $12,938.84 | 3 | 10/19/2016 |
| 4 | Bess, Danielle K. (Mrs.) | $10,304.40 | 2 | 01/03/2022 |
| 5 | The Fort Bend County Democratic Party (CEC) | $8,884.43 | 2 | 07/01/2007 |
| 6 | Roth, Joe D. (Mr.) | $1,993.27 | 1 | 10/17/2014 |
| 7 | Silverman, Charles (Mr.) | $1,623.75 | 1 | 08/09/2006 |
| 8 | Bay Area New Democrats | $1,353.12 | 1 | 01/09/2008 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Johnston Campaigns
Vendor ID 168946
|
6 | 75.0% | 147 | 4.0% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
|
6 | 75.0% | 492 | 1.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
6 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,669 | 0.3% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 140583
|
4 | 50.0% | 157 | 2.5% |
|
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
|
4 | 50.0% | 696 | 0.6% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
4 | 50.0% | 906 | 0.4% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,536 | 0.3% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,958 | 0.2% |
|
ACADEMY AWARDS
Vendor ID 5400
|
3 | 37.5% | 27 | 9.4% |
|
RELIANT ENERGY
Vendor ID 258897
|
3 | 37.5% | 97 | 2.9% |
|
TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 306653
|
3 | 37.5% | 183 | 1.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2023 | Houston Police Officers Union PAC | $20,315.78 | PAC Mailers |
| 10/18/2023 | Houston Police Officers Union PAC | $9,447.48 | PAC mailers |
| 10/10/2023 | Houston Police Officers Union PAC | $74,660.43 | PAC mailers |
| 01/03/2022 | Bess, Danielle K. (Mrs.) | $5,152.20 | Print & Mail |
| 01/03/2022 | Bess, Danielle K. (Mrs.) | $5,152.20 | Print & Mail |
| 10/19/2016 | Harris County Tejano Democrats | $5,419.50 | Election Push Card |
| 10/13/2015 | Harris County Tejano Democrats | $3,759.67 | Print and mail 6" x 11" mailer |
| 10/17/2014 | Roth, Joe D. (Mr.) | $1,993.27 | Mailer |
| 03/01/2008 | Bailey, Kevin (Mr.) | $8,829.55 | Mail Printing Consulting |
| 03/01/2008 | Bailey, Kevin (Mr.) | $8,829.55 | Mail Printing Consulting |
| 02/29/2008 | Bailey, Kevin (Mr.) | $10,857.51 | Mail Printing Consulting |
| 02/29/2008 | Bailey, Kevin (Mr.) | $10,857.51 | Mail Printing Consulting |
| 01/09/2008 | Bay Area New Democrats | $1,353.12 | payment for doorhangers-submitted by J. Cobarruvias\n paid with check 1307 |
| 07/01/2007 | The Fort Bend County Democratic Party (CEC) | $3,262.00 | Printing Political Material |
| 10/30/2006 | The Fort Bend County Democratic Party (CEC) | $5,622.43 | Political Mail-Out |
| 08/09/2006 | Silverman, Charles (Mr.) | $1,623.75 | consulting |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.