Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

John Raley & Associates

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 168237 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$169,510.54
Client Filers
3
Payments
25
Activity Range
03/25/2023–06/28/2024
Largest Payment
$48,247.10
Graph: 3 connected filers · 25 payments · $169,510.54 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Schaffer, Robert K. (The Honorable)$126,525.57406/20/2024
2Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$26,814.481405/24/2024
3Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$16,170.49706/28/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TREEBEARDS
Vendor ID 332846
3 100.0% 84 3.6%
HOUSTON BAR FOUNDATION
Vendor ID 151342
3 100.0% 114 2.6%
HOUSTON BLACK AMERICAN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 151365
3 100.0% 177 1.7%
UNITED AIRLINES
Vendor ID 337997
3 100.0% 388 0.8%
TEXAS CENTER FOR THE JUDICIARY
Vendor ID 310161
3 100.0% 460 0.7%
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
3 100.0% 492 0.6%
JASON'S DELI
Vendor ID 162552
3 100.0% 649 0.5%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
3 100.0% 1,445 0.2%
Baptist Ministers Association of Houston & Vicinity PAC
Vendor ID 27434
2 66.7% 5 33.3%
Irma's Southwest
Vendor ID 158528
2 66.7% 9 20.0%
Texas Democratic Women of the Harris County Metro Area
Vendor ID 310887
2 66.7% 9 20.0%
13 Celsius
Vendor ID 454
2 66.7% 10 18.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/28/2024Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$680.90Attorney fee costs for election lawsuit
06/20/2024Schaffer, Robert K. (The Honorable)$35,069.85Attorney's fees
05/24/2024Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$680.90Final attorney fee invoice
04/29/2024Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$2,637.02Attorney Fees for August 2023
04/29/2024Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$1,836.00Attorney Fees for October 2023
04/29/2024Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$1,647.44Attorney Fees for September 2023
04/16/2024Schaffer, Robert K. (The Honorable)$48,247.10Attorney's fees
03/14/2024Schaffer, Robert K. (The Honorable)$38,583.62Attorney's fees
02/20/2024Schaffer, Robert K. (The Honorable)$4,625.00Attorney fees
02/12/2024Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$3,510.44Attorney fee for election lawsuit
12/13/2023Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$2,283.40Attorneys' fees for defense of election challenge
12/13/2023Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$1,259.50Attorneys' fees for defense of election challenge
11/06/2023Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$3,500.00Attorney fees and expenses for election lawsuit.
11/03/2023Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$1,500.00Attorney fees and expenses for election lawsuit.
11/03/2023Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$1,320.75Attorneys' fees for defense of election challenge
11/02/2023Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$2,500.00Attorney fees and expenses for election lawsuit.
07/12/2023Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$1,979.15Attorney fees and expenses for election lawsuit.
07/11/2023Payne, Latosha Lewis (The Honorable)$2,500.00Attorney fees and expenses for election lawsuit.
06/27/2023Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$1,621.60Attorneys Fees for Election Contest
06/21/2023Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$2,857.22Attorneys Fees for Election Contest
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.