Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JOHN MABRY CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 168042 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$50,500.00
Client Filers
26
Payments
40
Activity Range
10/15/2002–10/15/2010
Largest Payment
$12,500.00
Graph: 26 connected filers · 40 payments · $50,500.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- John Mabry Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHUCK HOPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 62632
|
22 | 84.6% | 172 | 12.5% |
|
MARK HOMER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 203518
|
21 | 80.8% | 132 | 15.3% |
|
JESSICA FARRAR CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 164675
|
20 | 76.9% | 144 | 13.3% |
|
JUAN ESCOBAR CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 170380
|
19 | 73.1% | 64 | 26.8% |
|
JIM MCREYNOLDS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165432
|
18 | 69.2% | 116 | 14.5% |
|
RICHARD RAYMOND CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 263650
|
18 | 69.2% | 167 | 10.3% |
|
LETICIA VAN DE PUTTE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 190413
|
18 | 69.2% | 202 | 8.6% |
|
DAN ELLIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 83564
|
17 | 65.4% | 60 | 24.6% |
|
SCOTT HOCHBERG CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 277773
|
17 | 65.4% | 91 | 17.0% |
|
LON BURNAM CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 194136
|
17 | 65.4% | 95 | 16.3% |
|
VALINDA BOLTON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 342260
|
17 | 65.4% | 102 | 15.3% |
|
CARLOS URESTI CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 52440
|
17 | 65.4% | 164 | 9.8% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2010 | Texas AFT Committee on Political Education | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/15/2010 | Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen | $300.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/07/2010 | State COPE Fund | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution HD 56 |
| 09/01/2010 | State COPE Fund | $750.00 | Campaign Contribution HD 56 |
| 05/10/2010 | House Democratic Campaign Committee | $10,000.00 | Inkind research |
| 11/01/2004 | Texans for Excellence in Government | $500.00 | Contribution |
| 10/22/2004 | Naishtat, Elliott | $200.00 | contribution |
| 10/19/2004 | Texas Alliance of Recreational Organizations Inc. PAC | $250.00 | Political contribution to support Democratic candidate for State Representative District 56. |
| 10/13/2004 | Burnam, Lon M | $250.00 | Political contribution |
| 10/12/2004 | Veasey, Marc (Mr.) | $500.00 | CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/10/2004 | Texas Federation of Teachers Committee on Political Education | $1,000.00 | Officeholder/campaign support |
| 10/07/2004 | Coleman, Garnet (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/05/2004 | Heart of Texas Democratic Forum | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/28/2004 | Texas RN/APN PAC of the Texas Nurses Association et al. | $500.00 | Support John Mabry |
| 09/22/2004 | COMPASS BANCSHARES INC PAC | $2,000.00 | CONTRIBUTION TO POLITICAL COMMITTEE |
| 09/22/2004 | SBC Texas Employee PAC | $150.00 | John Mabry STATE HOUSE 56th TX |
| 09/12/2004 | Naishtat, Elliott | $200.00 | donation |
| 09/10/2004 | House Democratic Campaign Committee | $12,500.00 | Contribution |
| 07/13/2004 | Texas Employee Political Action Committee of TXU Corp. | $1,000.00 | John Mabry STATE HOUSE 56th TX |
| 07/09/2004 | Texas Federation of Teachers Committee on Political Education | $1,000.00 | Officeholder/campaign support |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.