Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Jim Wright Campaign
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 165672 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$656,450.00
Client Filers
20
Payments
41
Activity Range
04/11/2003–05/18/2026
Largest Payment
$500,000.00
Graph: 20 connected filers · 41 payments · $656,450.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Jim Wright Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHRISTI CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 62042
|
15 | 75.0% | 144 | 10.1% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
15 | 75.0% | 325 | 4.5% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
15 | 75.0% | 524 | 2.8% |
|
KEN KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 176470
|
14 | 70.0% | 195 | 7.0% |
|
BRYAN HUGHES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 44066
|
14 | 70.0% | 230 | 5.9% |
|
CRAIG GOLDMAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 78125
|
13 | 65.0% | 198 | 6.3% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
13 | 65.0% | 253 | 5.0% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
13 | 65.0% | 273 | 4.6% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
13 | 65.0% | 289 | 4.4% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
13 | 65.0% | 295 | 4.3% |
|
DREW SPRINGER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95637
|
12 | 60.0% | 126 | 9.0% |
|
TERRY CANALES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 307629
|
12 | 60.0% | 151 | 7.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2026 | Targa Resources Corp. Texas PAC | $25,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 05/18/2026 | Baker Botts Amicus Fund | $2,500.00 | Sponsorship |
| 05/12/2026 | Targa Resources Corp. Texas PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 04/30/2026 | HS LAW PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 04/29/2026 | Nichols, Robert Lee (The Honorable) | $1,500.00 | Campaign contribtion |
| 04/23/2026 | Texas Sands PAC | $500,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 04/15/2026 | Geren, Charles L. (The Honorable) | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 04/14/2026 | Kelly Hart & Hallman PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 04/14/2026 | Texas Pipeline Association Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 03/31/2026 | Targa Resources Corp. Texas PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 03/06/2026 | Waste Management Employees Better Government Fund | $5,000.00 | Contribution |
| 02/11/2026 | Targa Resources Corp. Texas PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 01/14/2026 | Targa Resources Corp. Texas PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 01/13/2026 | Kelly Hart & Hallman PAC | $2,500.00 | Political contribution |
| 01/13/2026 | Texas Pipeline Association Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 12/19/2025 | Geren, Charles L. (The Honorable) | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/16/2025 | TX Diamondback Energy, Inc. Political Action Committee | $10,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 11/11/2025 | Texas Alliance for Life | $100.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/14/2025 | Howard Energy Partners PAC | $10,000.00 | political contribution |
| 06/30/2025 | Targa Resources Corp. Texas PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign contibution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.