Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JIM PITTS CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 165491 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$886,488.06
Client Filers
189
Payments
813
Activity Range
06/13/2000–12/06/2013
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 189 connected filers · 813 payments · $886,488.06 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Jim Pitts Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
134 | 70.9% | 386 | 30.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
127 | 67.2% | 524 | 21.7% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
122 | 64.6% | 230 | 41.1% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
122 | 64.6% | 325 | 31.1% |
|
JOHN CARONA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167515
|
121 | 64.0% | 213 | 43.1% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
117 | 61.9% | 295 | 31.9% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
115 | 60.8% | 227 | 38.2% |
|
TEXANS FOR JOE STRAUS
Vendor ID 308707
|
114 | 60.3% | 297 | 30.6% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
112 | 59.3% | 187 | 42.4% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
111 | 58.7% | 325 | 27.5% |
|
BYRON COOK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 46692
|
109 | 57.7% | 165 | 44.5% |
|
DAVID DEWHURST COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 85094
|
108 | 57.1% | 236 | 34.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/06/2013 | IATSE Local 484 PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Donation |
| 08/20/2013 | Union Pacific Corp. Fund for Effective Government | $5,000.00 | JIM PITTS STATE HOUSE 10th TX |
| 12/07/2012 | University of Houston Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Campaign Donation |
| 12/06/2012 | IATSE Local 484 PAC | $1,000.00 | contribution to Jim Pitts Campaign |
| 12/06/2012 | The Real Estate Council Political Action Committee | $750.00 | campaign contribution |
| 12/04/2012 | K&L Gates LLP Committee for Good Government | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution to support candidate. |
| 11/30/2012 | Friends Of The University PAC | $2,500.00 | Political Contribution |
| 11/26/2012 | Texas Pipeline Association Political Action Committee | $250.00 | Contribution |
| 11/21/2012 | Texas Pharmacy Association PAC | $3,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/21/2012 | The GEO Group Inc. PAC | $1,000.00 | Jim Pitts STATE HOUSE 10th TX |
| 11/21/2012 | CLEAT PAC | $1,000.00 | campaign contribution |
| 11/20/2012 | Valero Energy Corporation Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Jim Pitts - TX - Support |
| 11/09/2012 | A&M Political Action Commiittee | $5,000.00 | Contribution |
| 11/04/2012 | Texas State Rifle Association PAC | $500.00 | campaign contribution |
| 11/01/2012 | NuStarpac | $2,500.00 | Political Contribution |
| 11/01/2012 | Webster Surgical Specialty Hospital PAC | $2,000.00 | campaign contribution |
| 10/30/2012 | Texas Food and Fuel Association | $2,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/24/2012 | AtmosEnergyCorporationPAC | $2,000.00 | James Pitts STATE HOUSE 10th TX |
| 10/12/2012 | Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, a Division of Health Care Service Corporation | $1,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 10/12/2012 | HOMEPAC of Texas | $1,000.00 | PAC Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.