Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Jim Keffer Campaign Committee

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 165368 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$54,000.00
Client Filers
5
Payments
19
Activity Range
10/30/2000–10/17/2014
Largest Payment
$6,000.00
Graph: 5 connected filers · 19 payments · $54,000.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1PSEL PAC$20,000.00410/17/2014
2Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$16,500.00410/17/2014
3Coalition for Better Transportation$13,500.00602/27/2012
4Texas Employee Political Action Committee of Texas Utilities Company d/b/a TXU Corp$3,500.00410/17/2002
5Quicksilver Resources PAC$500.00111/30/2010

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Kent Grusendorf Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 177063
4 80.0% 4 80.0%
Ray Allen Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 256037
4 80.0% 5 66.7%
TODD SMITH CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 329257
4 80.0% 5 66.7%
KIP AVERITT CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 179369
4 80.0% 7 50.0%
Phil King Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 243364
4 80.0% 11 33.3%
TEXANS FOR JOE STRAUS
Vendor ID 308707
4 80.0% 297 1.3%
Barbara Nash Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 27750
3 60.0% 3 60.0%
Diane Patrick Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 90288
3 60.0% 3 60.0%
Gene Seaman Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 127322
3 60.0% 3 60.0%
Ken Marchant Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 176501
3 60.0% 3 60.0%
Bill Ratliff Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 34888
3 60.0% 4 50.0%
Clyde Alexander Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 67823
3 60.0% 4 50.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
01/14/2014Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$6,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas House of Representatives District 60
11/20/2012PSEL PAC$5,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas House of Representatives
11/20/2012Good Government Fund (Fort Worth)$5,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas House of Representatives
02/27/2012Coalition for Better Transportation$3,000.00Campaign Contribution
11/30/2010Quicksilver Resources PAC$500.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas House of Representatives District 60
10/15/2010Coalition for Better Transportation$3,000.00Campaign Contribution
08/30/2010PSEL PAC$5,000.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas House District 60
10/20/2008Coalition for Better Transportation$1,500.00Campaign contribution
08/23/2006Coalition for Better Transportation$3,000.00Campaign contribution
09/21/2004Coalition for Better Transportation$2,500.00Campaign Contribution
10/17/2002Texas Employee Political Action Committee of TXU Corp.$1,250.00Jim Keffer STATE HOUSE 60th TX
01/28/2002Texas Employee Political Action Committee of Texas Utilities Company d/b/a TXU Corp$750.00Political Expenditure
01/14/2002Coalition for Better Transportation$500.00Campaign Contribution
12/06/2001Texas Employee Political Action Committee of Texas Utilities Company d/b/a TXU Corp$1,000.00Political Expenditure
11/20/2000Texas Employee Political Action Committee Of Texas Utilities Co. d/b/a TXU Corp.$500.00Campaign Contribution
10/30/2000Good Government Fund$500.00Political contribution toward candidacy for Texas - House - District 60
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.