Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

JEFFERSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Organization
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 163803 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$423,855.04
Client Filers
39
Payments
682
Activity Range
09/26/2000–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 39 connected filers · 682 payments · $423,855.04 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$218,108.2350006/30/2026
2Texas Democratic Party$46,000.00310/30/2020
3Deshotel, Jospeh (Mr.)$21,675.005701/24/2023
4Sanderson, Justin G. (The Honorable)$20,925.001110/25/2024
5Plumbers Local #68 PAC$17,500.00510/12/2018
6Stevens Jr., John B. (The Honorable)$15,300.001311/13/2025
7Wortham, Baylor G. (The Honorable)$11,500.00509/24/2023
8Jefferson County Democratic Party (CEC)$8,700.00410/21/2022
9Ritter, Allan$5,850.00712/09/2009
10Shuffield, Milton$4,500.00311/28/2011
11Wortham, Bob (Mr.)$4,500.00312/01/2009
12Jefferson County Democratic Party$4,399.421212/30/2003
13Progressive Democrats of Southeast Texas$4,135.00810/08/2021
14Walston, W. Kent (The Honorable)$4,000.00211/15/2021
15Southeast Texas Democratic Women$3,700.00309/10/2025
16West, Raquel (The Honorable)$3,625.00411/15/2021
17Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$3,182.001506/05/2026
18Sanderson, James Gary$3,000.00211/28/2011
19Shelton, Jeffery R. (The Honorable)$3,000.00211/26/2025
20Tony Sanchez for Governor Inc.$3,000.00111/04/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
22 56.4% 3,017 0.7%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
21 53.8% 1,669 1.2%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
19 48.7% 1,360 1.4%
JASON'S DELI
Vendor ID 162552
17 43.6% 649 2.5%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
17 43.6% 1,480 1.1%
THE EXAMINER
Vendor ID 318677
16 41.0% 53 21.1%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
15 38.5% 1,368 1.1%
PORT ARTHUR NEWS
Vendor ID 247508
14 35.9% 27 26.9%
SOILEAU PRINTING
Vendor ID 287441
14 35.9% 54 17.7%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
14 35.9% 1,445 1.0%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
13 33.3% 1,174 1.1%
Beaumont Enterprise
Vendor ID 30106
12 30.8% 39 18.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026ActBlue Texas$144.06POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/28/2026ActBlue Texas$268.91POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$115.23POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$364.94POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$316.90POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/05/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$10.00donation
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$292.92POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/24/2026ActBlue Texas$264.11POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/17/2026ActBlue Texas$148.85POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$403.33POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/05/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$10.00donation
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$441.79POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/26/2026ActBlue Texas$283.31POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$105.64POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$321.72POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026ActBlue Texas$340.91POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$10.00donation
03/31/2026ActBlue Texas$91.24POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/29/2026ActBlue Texas$172.87POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$552.25POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.