Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Jeff Crosby Consulting
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 163511 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$7,816.00
Client Filers
2
Payments
2
Activity Range
10/06/2015–06/05/2018
Largest Payment
$5,238.00
Graph: 2 connected filers · 2 payments · $7,816.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Jeff Crosby Consulting
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fowler, Garen Elaina (Ms.) | $5,238.00 | 1 | 06/05/2018 |
| 2 | Gonzalez, Mary Edna (The Honorable) | $2,578.00 | 1 | 10/06/2015 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WORLEY PRINTING
Vendor ID 357411
|
2 | 100.0% | 256 | 0.8% |
|
CVS
Vendor ID 80869
|
2 | 100.0% | 354 | 0.6% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
2 | 100.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,669 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2018 | Fowler, Garen Elaina (Ms.) | $5,238.00 | GOTV |
| 10/06/2015 | Gonzalez, Mary Edna (The Honorable) | $2,578.00 | Campaign material printing and consulting |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.