Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JASON SMITH FOR CONGRESS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 162519 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$133,500.00
Client Filers
19
Payments
57
Activity Range
03/24/2014–05/12/2026
Largest Payment
$5,000.00
Graph: 19 connected filers · 57 payments · $133,500.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Jason Smith for Congress
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR JODEY ARRINGTON
Vendor ID 308700
|
16 | 84.2% | 45 | 33.3% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
16 | 84.2% | 524 | 3.0% |
|
DAN CRENSHAW FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 83541
|
14 | 73.7% | 35 | 35.0% |
|
TEXANS FOR HENRY CUELLAR CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 308661
|
13 | 68.4% | 55 | 21.3% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
13 | 68.4% | 325 | 3.9% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
13 | 68.4% | 359 | 3.6% |
|
SCALISE FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 276932
|
12 | 63.2% | 30 | 32.4% |
|
BRADY FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 40578
|
12 | 63.2% | 66 | 16.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR SENATOR JOHN CORNYN
Vendor ID 308866
|
12 | 63.2% | 73 | 15.0% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
12 | 63.2% | 289 | 4.1% |
|
STEVE DAINES FOR MONTANA
Vendor ID 296577
|
11 | 57.9% | 18 | 42.3% |
|
THOM TILLIS COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 326560
|
11 | 57.9% | 22 | 36.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2026 | Phillips 66 PAC | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 05/12/2026 | Texas Rice Producers Legislative Group PAC | $500.00 | Political contribution |
| 02/05/2026 | Southwest Airlines Co. Political Action Committee | $5,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 09/09/2025 | Comerica Inc. PAC | $1,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 05/16/2025 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $5,000.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/25/2025 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $5,000.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/09/2025 | Tenet Healthcare Corporation Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 03/20/2025 | Phillips 66 PAC | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 03/17/2025 | Phillips 66 PAC | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 02/21/2025 | HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC | $5,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 09/30/2024 | Southwest Airlines Co. Political Action Committee | $3,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 09/06/2024 | Plains All American GP LLC PAC - Texas | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 07/25/2024 | Coterra Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 07/19/2024 | Ovintiv USA INC. PAC | $2,500.00 | PAC Political Contribution |
| 06/11/2024 | Calpine Corporation PAC | $2,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 05/09/2024 | Southwest Airlines Co. Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 02/28/2024 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $5,000.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/13/2024 | Plains All American GP LLC PAC - Texas | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 01/18/2024 | Phillips 66 PAC | $5,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 11/29/2023 | Plains All American GP LLC PAC - Texas | $5,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.