Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JAMES FRANK CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 161592 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$394,694.98
Client Filers
106
Payments
294
Activity Range
03/07/2012–06/17/2026
Largest Payment
$20,000.00
Graph: 106 connected filers · 294 payments · $394,694.98 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- James Frank Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
84 | 79.2% | 325 | 24.2% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
81 | 76.4% | 289 | 25.8% |
|
GIOVANNI CAPRIGLIONE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 129221
|
80 | 75.5% | 196 | 36.0% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
79 | 74.5% | 295 | 24.5% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
79 | 74.5% | 325 | 22.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
79 | 74.5% | 359 | 20.5% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
78 | 73.6% | 273 | 25.9% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
78 | 73.6% | 524 | 14.1% |
|
CHARLES PERRY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58084
|
75 | 70.8% | 226 | 29.2% |
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
74 | 69.8% | 239 | 27.3% |
|
JOHN KUEMPEL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167958
|
73 | 68.9% | 220 | 28.9% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
73 | 68.9% | 268 | 24.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2026 | Texas Dental Association Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 07/21/2026 | NRG Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
| 06/17/2026 | Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Contribution-HD 69 |
| 05/21/2026 | Centene Corporation Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | To Support General 2026 State House 69 TX |
| 02/13/2026 | Beef PAC | $1,000.00 | TX/TX/House /District 69 Non-federal contr. |
| 01/23/2026 | Intersect LLC PAC | $2,000.00 | Political Contribution - James Frank |
| 12/17/2025 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/03/2025 | Texas Assisted Living Association PAC | $1,500.00 | Campaign contributions |
| 10/16/2025 | Gulf States Toyota Inc. State PAC | $500.00 | Contribution |
| 07/01/2025 | Provider Coalition for Care Political Action Committee | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 06/23/2025 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 12/13/2024 | HS LAW PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/26/2024 | Texas Apartment Assn. PAC | $750.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/21/2024 | Holland & Knight Texas PAC | $500.00 | House District District 69 |
| 11/20/2024 | Charter Schools Now PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/18/2024 | Texas Bankers Association Bankers PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution to non-federal candidate |
| 11/14/2024 | AT&T Inc. Texas Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | James Frank, STATE HOUSE 69th TX |
| 11/07/2024 | Friends of the Texas Tech University System PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 10/25/2024 | Hagenbuch, Brent (Mr.) | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/24/2024 | Wichita County Republican Party | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.