Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Jack's
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 160768 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$7,109.46
Client Filers
2
Payments
4
Activity Range
06/22/2010–02/16/2016
Largest Payment
$5,547.50
Graph: 2 connected filers · 4 payments · $7,109.46 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Jack's
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC) | $7,067.50 | 3 | 02/16/2016 |
| 2 | Sharp, Jim (The Honorable) | $41.96 | 1 | 06/22/2010 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
U S POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 336553
|
2 | 100.0% | 89 | 2.2% |
|
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
|
2 | 100.0% | 696 | 0.3% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
2 | 100.0% | 906 | 0.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2016 | Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC) | $760.00 | candidate forum |
| 03/12/2015 | Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC) | $5,547.50 | food for event |
| 06/22/2010 | Sharp, Jim (The Honorable) | $41.96 | gas |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.