Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
JP Solutions
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 170118 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$89,568.51
Client Filers
4
Payments
37
Activity Range
01/08/2010–10/03/2016
Largest Payment
$4,061.24
Graph: 4 connected filers · 37 payments · $89,568.51 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- JP Solutions
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $50,204.41 | 21 | 10/03/2016 |
| 2 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $34,432.96 | 11 | 03/06/2014 |
| 3 | Harris, William (Mr.) | $3,701.14 | 4 | 02/02/2010 |
| 4 | Sinha, Michael (Mr.) | $1,230.00 | 1 | 11/16/2010 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TARRANT COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 304945
|
3 | 75.0% | 190 | 1.6% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
LL Design
Vendor ID 193288
|
2 | 50.0% | 7 | 22.2% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TARRANT COUNTY
Vendor ID 261854
|
2 | 50.0% | 13 | 13.3% |
|
Fort Worth Republican Women's Club
Vendor ID 116671
|
2 | 50.0% | 15 | 11.8% |
|
REPUBLICAN FORUM
Vendor ID 261540
|
2 | 50.0% | 23 | 8.0% |
|
PublicData.com
Vendor ID 251733
|
2 | 50.0% | 28 | 6.7% |
|
FEDEXOFFICE
Vendor ID 111716
|
2 | 50.0% | 41 | 4.7% |
|
ARLINGTON REPUBLICAN CLUB
Vendor ID 19997
|
2 | 50.0% | 87 | 2.2% |
|
REPUBLICAN WOMEN OF ARLINGTON
Vendor ID 262042
|
2 | 50.0% | 87 | 2.2% |
|
TARRANT COUNTY GOP
Vendor ID 304888
|
2 | 50.0% | 108 | 1.8% |
|
DENTON COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 88779
|
2 | 50.0% | 149 | 1.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $1,221.83 | October Consulting |
| 09/01/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | Consulting - September |
| 08/02/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | Consulting - August |
| 05/03/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $2,529.03 | May Consulting fee & Phone reimbursement |
| 04/05/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $2,500.00 | April Consulting Fee |
| 03/11/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | March Consulting Fee |
| 02/18/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $131.83 | Breakfast sponsor sign |
| 02/03/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | February Consulting Fees |
| 01/06/2016 | Wallach, David M. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | January Consulting Fee |
| 03/06/2014 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $3,069.28 | Fundraising Consulting |
| 02/13/2014 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $2,598.00 | Fundraising Consultant |
| 01/03/2014 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $2,684.00 | Consulting |
| 11/04/2013 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $4,061.24 | Consulting |
| 10/02/2013 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $3,879.88 | Consulting |
| 09/05/2013 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $2,599.72 | Consulting |
| 08/01/2013 | Opiela, Eric (Mr.) | $2,500.00 | Consulting |
| 11/16/2010 | Sinha, Michael (Mr.) | $1,230.00 | Campaign services |
| 02/02/2010 | Harris, William (Mr.) | $1,225.57 | Consulting and Reimbursement |
| 01/11/2010 | Harris, William (Mr.) | $800.00 | January 2010 |
| 01/08/2010 | Harris, William (Mr.) | $450.00 | Consulting |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.