Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

INTUIT MAILCHIMP

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 158175 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$10,972.29
Client Filers
23
Payments
235
Activity Range
07/01/2022–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$339.00
Graph: 23 connected filers · 235 payments · $10,972.29 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Davis, Dedra (The Honorable)$1,336.883106/23/2025
2Cypress-Tomball Democrats$1,239.903206/01/2026
3Bayou Blue Democrats$1,075.322206/02/2026
4Huffines, Donald B. (Mr.)$1,011.641106/29/2026
5Carson, Paulette (Mrs.)$954.452003/12/2026
6Cloud, Carvana (Ms.)$831.481311/14/2024
7Dripping Area Democrats$767.523606/21/2026
8Limon Bazan, Stephanie$575.64301/29/2026
9Parker, Gina G. (Ms.)$454.35210/10/2024
10A Better Texas$450.452202/20/2026
11Democratic Women of Comal County$405.08306/30/2026
12Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$372.311206/22/2026
13Muslim Democratic Caucus Political Action Committee$356.51612/08/2025
14Morales, Christina (The Honorable)$339.00101/16/2025
15Westlake Eanes Democrats$287.82112/31/2025
16Hidalgo County Democratic Party Executive Committee$133.25504/07/2026
17Red Stiletto Republican Women$85.28407/06/2025
18Lake Travis Voices for Progress$76.76306/22/2026
19Save Lost Creek PAC$63.43312/01/2024
20Vote YES! For CCISD$50.00109/04/2023

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
13 56.5% 1,174 1.1%
DOLLAR TREE
Vendor ID 92561
9 39.1% 578 1.5%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
9 39.1% 1,638 0.5%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
9 39.1% 1,669 0.5%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
9 39.1% 1,876 0.5%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
9 39.1% 3,017 0.3%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
8 34.8% 1,480 0.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
8 34.8% 1,958 0.4%
MAILCHIMP
Vendor ID 200740
7 30.4% 486 1.4%
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
6 26.1% 592 1.0%
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
6 26.1% 898 0.7%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
6 26.1% 785 0.7%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
08/01/2026Bayou Blue Democrats$61.56E-mails about monthly meetings
07/29/2026Cypress-Tomball Democrats$47.97Email services
07/02/2026Bayou Blue Democrats$61.56 Advertises monthly meeting and newsletter.
06/30/2026Democratic Women of Comal County$127.92Software
06/29/2026Huffines, Donald B. (Mr.)$117.26Email Software
06/29/2026Cypress-Tomball Democrats$47.97Email services
06/22/2026Lake Travis Voices for Progress$49.04Mail Platform
06/22/2026Taylor, Holly E. (Ms.)$47.97email processing
06/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
06/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
06/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
06/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
06/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
06/15/2026Texas Democratic Women of Hood County$41.26Monthly Subscription (13.70/month)
06/02/2026Bayou Blue Democrats$61.56Cost for e-mails for monthly meeting.
06/01/2026Cypress-Tomball Democrats$47.97Email services
05/29/2026Huffines, Donald B. (Mr.)$117.26Email Software
05/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
05/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
05/21/2026Dripping Area Democrats$21.32Email services
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.