Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

INTERNATIONAL BANK

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 157878 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$53,401.16
Client Filers
5
Payments
63
Activity Range
02/02/2006–12/14/2016
Largest Payment
$35,116.70
Graph: 5 connected filers · 63 payments · $53,401.16 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$37,510.353412/14/2016
2Flores, Ismael$14,341.812402/19/2009
3Saenz, Jose (Mr.)$1,500.00212/23/2007
4Munoz Jr., Sergio (The Honorable)$40.00210/16/2013
5Enriquez, Sergio H. (The Honorable)$9.00112/18/2015

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
THE MONITOR
Vendor ID 322014
4 80.0% 86 4.6%
TEXAS CITRUS FIESTA
Vendor ID 310247
3 60.0% 17 15.8%
PROGRESS TIMES
Vendor ID 250813
3 60.0% 19 14.3%
CITY OF MCALLEN
Vendor ID 65610
3 60.0% 21 13.0%
HIDALGO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 144917
3 60.0% 94 3.1%
PALENQUE GRILL
Vendor ID 236065
3 60.0% 95 3.1%
H.E.B.
Vendor ID 137693
3 60.0% 215 1.4%
DOLLAR GENERAL
Vendor ID 92443
3 60.0% 337 0.9%
SAMS CLUB
Vendor ID 274002
3 60.0% 422 0.7%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
3 60.0% 1,101 0.3%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
3 60.0% 1,045 0.3%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
3 60.0% 1,174 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/14/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$35,116.70Loan payment
11/09/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.81Monthly loan payment
10/11/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$67.56Loan payment
09/09/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.81Loan payment
08/09/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.81Loan payment
07/19/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$27.54Loan payment
07/11/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$67.56Loan Payment
06/11/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.81Loan payment
06/09/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.81Loan Payment
05/09/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$67.57Loan payment
04/11/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.81Loan payment
03/09/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$65.81Loan payment
02/09/2016Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.82Loan payment
12/18/2015Enriquez, Sergio H. (The Honorable)$9.00Bank Fees for Checking Account
12/09/2015Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$67.56Loan payment
11/09/2015Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.81Loan payment
10/09/2015Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$67.56Loan payment
08/19/2015Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$110.00Loan payment
04/09/2015Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$77.28Loan payment
03/09/2015Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$69.80Loan payment
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.