Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Innovative Office Systems
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 157211 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$10,527.71
Client Filers
2
Payments
46
Activity Range
01/11/2023–06/23/2026
Largest Payment
$1,091.50
Graph: 2 connected filers · 46 payments · $10,527.71 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Innovative Office Systems
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nacogdoches County Republican Party Executive Committee | $9,980.71 | 45 | 06/23/2026 |
| 2 | Montgomery County Democratic Executive Committee | $547.00 | 1 | 09/05/2024 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
U S POST OFFICE
Vendor ID 336541
|
2 | 100.0% | 67 | 3.0% |
|
LOWE'S
Vendor ID 196502
|
2 | 100.0% | 734 | 0.3% |
|
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,174 | 0.2% |
|
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
|
2 | 100.0% | 946 | 0.2% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,045 | 0.2% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,368 | 0.1% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,876 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.