Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Independence Strategy
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 156478 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$114,758.56
Client Filers
3
Payments
21
Activity Range
05/26/2020–10/12/2022
Largest Payment
$11,718.58
Graph: 3 connected filers · 21 payments · $114,758.56 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Independence Strategy
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shaw, Penny (The Honorable) | $54,818.43 | 13 | 01/06/2021 |
| 2 | Davis, Jerry V. (Mr.) | $39,969.87 | 6 | 07/07/2020 |
| 3 | Texas Democratic Party | $19,970.26 | 2 | 10/12/2022 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUBWAY
Vendor ID 299059
|
3 | 100.0% | 469 | 0.6% |
|
CHEVRON
Vendor ID 59468
|
3 | 100.0% | 596 | 0.5% |
|
SHELL
Vendor ID 281652
|
3 | 100.0% | 614 | 0.5% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
3 | 100.0% | 1,480 | 0.2% |
|
Later.com
Vendor ID 187511
|
2 | 66.7% | 7 | 25.0% |
|
BUCCEES
Vendor ID 44570
|
2 | 66.7% | 20 | 9.5% |
|
SISTERS UNITED ALLIANCE
Vendor ID 285483
|
2 | 66.7% | 39 | 5.0% |
|
HUMAN AGE DIGITAL
Vendor ID 153335
|
2 | 66.7% | 57 | 3.4% |
|
AMTRAK
Vendor ID 16028
|
2 | 66.7% | 73 | 2.7% |
|
Platinum Parking
Vendor ID 246071
|
2 | 66.7% | 73 | 2.7% |
|
TEXAS AFL-CIO
Vendor ID 309304
|
2 | 66.7% | 74 | 2.7% |
|
HUSTLE
Vendor ID 153883
|
2 | 66.7% | 92 | 2.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2022 | Texas Democratic Party | $9,985.13 | |
| 10/12/2022 | Texas Democratic Party | $9,985.13 | |
| 01/06/2021 | Shaw, Penny (The Honorable) | $1,000.00 | Consultant fees |
| 10/30/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $665.63 | Campaign digital expense |
| 10/14/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $5,000.00 | Campaign advertising material design, print, mail |
| 09/28/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $5,506.88 | Campaign advertising material design, print, mail |
| 08/20/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $2,792.00 | Campaign advertising material design, print and maile |
| 07/08/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $2,000.00 | Campaign advertising material design, print and mail |
| 07/07/2020 | Davis, Jerry V. (Mr.) | $9,213.85 | Direct Mailer |
| 07/03/2020 | Davis, Jerry V. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | Mailer |
| 06/30/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $6,500.00 | Campaign consulting & advertising expense |
| 06/24/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $6,554.40 | Campaign consulting & advertising expense |
| 06/19/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $6,555.93 | Campaign consulting & advertising expense |
| 06/17/2020 | Davis, Jerry V. (Mr.) | $11,718.58 | Mailer |
| 06/16/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $7,166.48 | Campaign consulting & advertising expense |
| 06/11/2020 | Davis, Jerry V. (Mr.) | $9,887.44 | Mailer |
| 06/08/2020 | Davis, Jerry V. (Mr.) | $3,000.00 | Mailer |
| 06/04/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $6,766.48 | Campaign consulting & advertising expense |
| 05/27/2020 | Shaw, Penny (Ms.) | $3,645.00 | Campaign consulting & advertising expense |
| 05/26/2020 | Davis, Jerry V. (Mr.) | $2,650.00 | Data |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.