Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
IMS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 156176 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$98,195.85
Client Filers
2
Payments
18
Activity Range
04/29/2006–07/20/2008
Largest Payment
$14,109.78
Graph: 2 connected filers · 18 payments · $98,195.85 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- IMS
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $93,905.85 | 16 | 07/20/2008 |
| 2 | Turner, Sylvester | $4,290.00 | 2 | 02/22/2008 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Houstons Restaurant
Vendor ID 152466
|
2 | 100.0% | 5 | 40.0% |
|
Sprint Digital Print
Vendor ID 292013
|
2 | 100.0% | 66 | 3.0% |
|
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES
Vendor ID 222535
|
2 | 100.0% | 93 | 2.2% |
|
DOUBLETREE
Vendor ID 94314
|
2 | 100.0% | 115 | 1.7% |
|
AT&T MOBILITY
Vendor ID 22030
|
2 | 100.0% | 178 | 1.1% |
|
LEGISLATIVE STUDY GROUP
Vendor ID 189739
|
2 | 100.0% | 198 | 1.0% |
|
CINGULAR WIRELESS
Vendor ID 63311
|
2 | 100.0% | 225 | 0.9% |
|
ROARING FORK
Vendor ID 265814
|
2 | 100.0% | 222 | 0.9% |
|
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
Vendor ID 74141
|
2 | 100.0% | 242 | 0.8% |
|
FOUR SEASONS HOTEL
Vendor ID 117210
|
2 | 100.0% | 263 | 0.8% |
|
VERIZON WIRELESS
Vendor ID 343509
|
2 | 100.0% | 290 | 0.7% |
|
SBC
Vendor ID 276810
|
2 | 100.0% | 321 | 0.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $4,443.19 | outstanding invoice for mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 02/27/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $14,109.78 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 02/25/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $8,853.81 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 02/22/2008 | Turner, Sylvester | $2,145.00 | Postage & Mailing |
| 02/19/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $10,865.17 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 02/04/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $7,498.40 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 01/23/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $7,498.40 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 01/15/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $7,545.50 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 01/05/2008 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $4,201.30 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 12/26/2007 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $5,989.33 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 12/26/2007 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $5,989.33 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 10/19/2007 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $4,020.97 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 10/19/2007 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $4,020.97 | mailing/postage expenses for mailers to district |
| 03/20/2007 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $1,316.00 | mailer to district |
| 07/07/2006 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $4,569.36 | mailer to district |
| 04/29/2006 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $1,492.17 | mailhouse services for constituent mailers |
| 04/29/2006 | Van Arsdale, Corbin (Mr.) | $1,492.17 | mailhouse services for constituent mailers |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.