Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Huntsville Item

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 153775 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$26,958.08
Client Filers
16
Payments
43
Activity Range
09/04/2000–06/09/2025
Largest Payment
$1,953.90
Graph: 16 connected filers · 43 payments · $26,958.08 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Save Huntsville by Organizing and Uniting Together$7,487.20806/04/2004
2Ellis, Daniel P. (The Honorable)$3,764.80811/06/2000
3Walker County Democrat Club$3,664.38610/16/2020
4Wharton, Arthur D. (The Honorable)$3,400.50606/09/2025
5Otto, John$3,036.50302/18/2014
6ATPE Direct$1,689.00105/11/2022
7Texas Association of Realtors Issues Mobilization PAC$818.40110/18/2002
8Young, Audrey G. (Dr.)$688.00210/31/2022
9Huntsville First$600.00104/20/2007
10SAN JACINTO COUNTY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$420.00110/27/2006
11Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$405.00106/12/2024
12Mullins, Dee Howard$336.00112/04/2024
13Morrison, James D. (Mr.)$217.00102/17/2016
14Johnson, Matthew E. (The Honorable)$179.80101/07/2021
15Davis, Rex (Mr.)$139.50110/15/2008
16O'Toole, Austin (Mr.)$112.00110/18/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
8 50.0% 3,017 0.3%
KSAM Radio
Vendor ID 181799
5 31.3% 10 23.8%
WALKER COUNTY REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 348112
5 31.3% 15 19.2%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF WALKER COUNTY
Vendor ID 261942
5 31.3% 26 13.5%
NAVASOTA EXAMINER
Vendor ID 223399
5 31.3% 46 8.8%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
5 31.3% 1,368 0.4%
KSAM
Vendor ID 181797
4 25.0% 8 20.0%
Walker County Republican Party
Vendor ID 348110
4 25.0% 18 13.3%
ENTERGY
Vendor ID 105003
4 25.0% 28 10.0%
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY
Vendor ID 273447
4 25.0% 32 9.1%
AMERICAN EXPRESS
Vendor ID 14540
4 25.0% 557 0.7%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
4 25.0% 906 0.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/09/2025Wharton, Arthur D. (The Honorable)$500.00ADVERTISING EXP
12/31/2024Wharton, Arthur D. (Mr.)$240.50newspaper ad
12/04/2024Mullins, Dee Howard$336.00Ad for campaign
07/11/2024Wharton, Arthur D. (Mr.)$1,094.00NEWSPAPER ADS
06/12/2024Bius, Walter B. (Mr.)$405.00Advertising
03/22/2024Wharton, Arthur D. (Mr.)$522.00NEWSPAPER ADS
02/23/2024Wharton, Arthur D. (Mr.)$522.00Newspaper ads
10/31/2022Young, Audrey G. (Dr.)$344.00 Advertisement in paper
05/11/2022ATPE Direct$1,689.00News Paper Ad
01/07/2021Johnson, Matthew E. (The Honorable)$179.80Subscription Fee
10/16/2020Walker County Democrat Club$1,746.00Newspaper ad
10/04/2016Walker County Democrat Club$448.00Get out the vote newspaper ad for Walker County Democratic Party
02/17/2016Morrison, James D. (Mr.)$217.001/8 page add in newspaper
10/15/2014Walker County Democrat Club$530.00Item Print Ads
06/16/2014Walker County Democrat Club$375.00Online Advertisments
02/18/2014Otto, John$140.00Campaign newspaper ad
02/06/2014Otto, John$1,720.00Campaign newspaper ad
09/24/2012Walker County Democrat Club$54.38Political ads in Huntsville Item newspaper
09/20/2012Walker County Democrat Club$511.00Series of Political Ads in this newspaper
05/14/2012Otto, John$1,176.50Newspaper ad
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.