Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Houston Community News

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 151517 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$10,809.33
Client Filers
7
Payments
10
Activity Range
03/01/2007–05/08/2019
Largest Payment
$2,650.00
Graph: 7 connected filers · 10 payments · $10,809.33 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Community For Conroe ISD's Future$5,154.00205/08/2019
2Strawn, Susan L. (Ms.)$1,669.36110/24/2008
3Otto, John$1,153.68110/24/2008
4Vacek, Clifford J. (Mr.)$936.18210/28/2008
5Murphy, Kevin (Mr.)$823.20110/08/2008
6Nichols, Robert$548.32205/11/2012
7O'Day, Michael (Mr.)$524.59103/01/2007

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
5 71.4% 3,017 0.2%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
4 57.1% 1,077 0.4%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
4 57.1% 1,327 0.3%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
4 57.1% 1,360 0.3%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
4 57.1% 1,368 0.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
4 57.1% 1,958 0.2%
VERIZON WIRELESS
Vendor ID 343509
3 42.9% 290 1.0%
SHELL
Vendor ID 281652
3 42.9% 614 0.5%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
3 42.9% 906 0.3%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
3 42.9% 1,638 0.2%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
3 42.9% 1,445 0.2%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
3 42.9% 1,876 0.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
05/08/2019Community For Conroe ISD's Future$2,650.00Conroe Courier advertising
04/02/2019Community For Conroe ISD's Future$2,504.00Courier/Villager advertising
05/11/2012Nichols, Robert$300.00Political advertising
10/18/2010Nichols, Robert$248.32Campaign advertising
10/28/2008Vacek, Clifford J. (Mr.)$468.09Ads in Fort Bend Sun and Katy Sun newspapers
10/24/2008Strawn, Susan L. (Ms.)$1,669.36advertising
10/24/2008Otto, John$1,153.68Newspaper ad
10/08/2008Murphy, Kevin (Mr.)$823.20news paper ads in Pearland Journal
03/01/2007O'Day, Michael (Mr.)$524.59Campaign Advertising
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.