Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Houston Bar Association Appellate Section

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 151312 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$3,567.00
Client Filers
14
Payments
70
Activity Range
08/15/2003–03/08/2018
Largest Payment
$160.00
Graph: 14 connected filers · 70 payments · $3,567.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Fowler, Wanda M. (The Honorable)$1,117.001611/15/2007
2Alcala, Elsa$770.001909/16/2010
3Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$700.001903/08/2018
4Sullivan, Kent C.$375.00406/17/2010
5Boyce, William (Mr.)$160.00108/19/2013
6Jamison, Martha H. (The Honorable)$120.00101/19/2012
7Bland, Jane N. (The Honorable)$70.00205/07/2013
8Keyes, Evelyn$60.00201/21/2013
9Hanks Jr., George C.$50.00108/15/2003
10Kennedy, Mary K. (The Honorable)$35.00101/21/2010
11Mirabal, Margaret$30.00111/19/2003
12Huddle, Rebeca (The Honorable)$30.00109/28/2011
13Anderson, John$25.00107/27/2005
14Guzman, Eva$25.00106/19/2008

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HOUSTON BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 151295
12 85.7% 182 6.5%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
12 85.7% 1,077 1.1%
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
11 78.6% 457 2.4%
HOUSTON BAR FOUNDATION
Vendor ID 151342
10 71.4% 114 8.5%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
9 64.3% 1,571 0.6%
The MJS Group
Vendor ID 321999
8 57.1% 45 15.7%
MJS GROUP
Vendor ID 215884
8 57.1% 56 12.9%
BRAZORIA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 41242
8 57.1% 84 8.9%
ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN ATTORNEYS
Vendor ID 21666
8 57.1% 94 8.0%
TEXAS CENTER FOR THE JUDICIARY
Vendor ID 310161
8 57.1% 460 1.7%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
8 57.1% 1,327 0.6%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
8 57.1% 1,445 0.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/08/2018Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$30.00Lunch meeting/CLE
02/08/2018Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$30.00Luncheon/CLE
11/09/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$30.00Monthly CLE Luncheon
10/12/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$30.00CLE Luncheon
09/12/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$30.00Monthly CLE luncheon
08/18/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$30.00CLE Luncheon
05/11/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00CLE Luncheon
04/13/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00 CLE Luncheon
03/09/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00CLE Luncheon
02/08/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00CLE Luncheon
01/12/2017Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00CLE Luncheon
11/17/2016Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00HBA Appellate Section Luncheon
10/17/2016Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00HBA Appellate Section Luncheon
09/15/2016Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00HBA Appellate Section Luncheon
08/11/2016Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00HBA Appellate Section Luncheon
07/18/2016Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00HBA Appellate Section Luncheon
10/08/2015Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00Appellate Section CLE Luncheon
08/10/2015Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00Appellate Section CLE Luncheon
07/13/2015Lloyd, Russell T. (The Honorable)$40.00Appellate Section CLE Luncheon
08/19/2013Boyce, William (Mr.)$160.00Luncheon
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.