Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
HEA Consulting
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 141876 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$778,257.87
Client Filers
9
Payments
113
Activity Range
07/30/2001–02/23/2004
Largest Payment
$110,237.90
Graph: 9 connected filers · 113 payments · $778,257.87 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- HEA Consulting
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $370,688.17 | 50 | 10/23/2002 |
| 2 | Reynolds, Harry (Mr.) | $198,972.06 | 11 | 12/24/2002 |
| 3 | Harrison, Edward Carl (Mr.) | $67,195.79 | 10 | 03/06/2002 |
| 4 | Jeffus, Larry (Mr.) | $44,986.74 | 6 | 05/16/2002 |
| 5 | Hope, Ruben | $28,827.32 | 17 | 02/23/2004 |
| 6 | Flynn, Dan | $28,202.91 | 9 | 04/03/2002 |
| 7 | Vitz, William | $20,000.00 | 3 | 04/10/2002 |
| 8 | Brown, Betty | $12,975.81 | 2 | 10/07/2002 |
| 9 | Mikus Jr., Jerry J. | $6,409.07 | 5 | 03/18/2002 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
8 | 88.9% | 3,017 | 0.3% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
7 | 77.8% | 1,536 | 0.5% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
6 | 66.7% | 1,571 | 0.4% |
|
Prime Advantage
Vendor ID 249729
|
5 | 55.6% | 5 | 55.6% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,368 | 0.4% |
|
VERIZON
Vendor ID 343471
|
4 | 44.4% | 195 | 2.0% |
|
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
|
4 | 44.4% | 696 | 0.6% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
4 | 44.4% | 906 | 0.4% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
4 | 44.4% | 1,077 | 0.4% |
|
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
|
4 | 44.4% | 1,360 | 0.3% |
|
Mail Max Inc.
Vendor ID 200647
|
3 | 33.3% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
City Of Greenville
Vendor ID 65411
|
3 | 33.3% | 7 | 23.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2004 | Hope, Ruben | $1,285.24 | Professional consulting services data entry for survey |
| 02/23/2004 | Hope, Ruben | $1,285.24 | Professional consulting services data entry for survey |
| 01/25/2004 | Hope, Ruben | $954.44 | Postage for mail |
| 01/25/2004 | Hope, Ruben | $954.44 | Postage for mail |
| 01/25/2004 | Hope, Ruben | $954.44 | Postage for mail |
| 12/31/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $2,093.27 | Mail Survey & Consulting |
| 12/31/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $2,093.27 | Mail Survey & Consulting |
| 12/04/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $3,520.25 | Survey Printing |
| 12/04/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $3,520.25 | Survey Printing |
| 11/16/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $1,000.00 | Consulting |
| 11/16/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $1,000.00 | Consulting |
| 10/07/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $1,184.32 | Professional Consulting |
| 10/07/2003 | Hope, Ruben | $1,184.32 | Professional Consulting |
| 12/24/2002 | Reynolds, Harry (Mr.) | $13,646.71 | Consultant |
| 12/10/2002 | Reynolds, Harry (Mr.) | $22,107.45 | Mailers |
| 10/23/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $49,080.35 | Printing Fees |
| 10/15/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $18,618.58 | Printing Fees |
| 10/15/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $6,131.93 | Printing Fees |
| 10/10/2002 | Deuell, Robert (Dr.) | $20,318.95 | Printing Fees |
| 10/07/2002 | Brown, Betty | $9,744.03 | Push cards |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.