Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
GuidePost Strategic Partners
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 136692 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$101,767.01
Client Filers
7
Payments
35
Activity Range
11/01/2021–06/29/2026
Largest Payment
$33,681.00
Graph: 7 connected filers · 35 payments · $101,767.01 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- GuidePost Strategic Partners
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zubeldia, Derek Lee (Mr.) | $41,125.15 | 4 | 11/09/2022 |
| 2 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $30,130.12 | 16 | 01/22/2026 |
| 3 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $13,525.00 | 7 | 01/28/2026 |
| 4 | Hispanic Republicans of Texas | $11,746.74 | 4 | 09/28/2023 |
| 5 | Rosa, Oscar (Mr.) | $3,000.00 | 2 | 11/01/2021 |
| 6 | Carrasco, Aimee (Mrs.) | $1,200.00 | 1 | 07/03/2023 |
| 7 | West Texas Patriots | $1,040.00 | 1 | 06/29/2026 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
|
5 | 71.4% | 642 | 0.8% |
|
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
|
3 | 42.9% | 677 | 0.4% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,571 | 0.2% |
|
Rio Grande Valley Republican Women
Vendor ID 264758
|
2 | 28.6% | 3 | 25.0% |
|
ERIC OPIELA PLLC
Vendor ID 105826
|
2 | 28.6% | 35 | 5.0% |
|
HAMPTON INN
Vendor ID 138633
|
2 | 28.6% | 337 | 0.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2026 | West Texas Patriots | $1,040.00 | Texting |
| 01/28/2026 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $6,500.00 | Campaign MMS Text Blasts to voters |
| 01/28/2026 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | Campaign mailer |
| 01/28/2026 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | Campaign consulting and GOTV efforts |
| 01/22/2026 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $100.02 | Office Subscription |
| 01/15/2026 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $115.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 01/15/2026 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $100.02 | Campaign Consulting |
| 01/13/2026 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $100.02 | Campaign Consulting |
| 01/09/2026 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 12/08/2025 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | Website design and hosting |
| 12/08/2025 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $500.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 12/05/2025 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 11/05/2025 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $3,500.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 11/05/2025 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $525.00 | Campaign consulting and campaign website domain |
| 10/27/2025 | Ingraham, Michael T. (Mr.) | $4,150.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 10/02/2025 | Mercer, Charles E. (Mr.) | $500.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 09/28/2023 | Hispanic Republicans of Texas | $2,500.00 | Kira Sanchez In-Kind Contribution - Website, Signs, Social Media, Graphics |
| 08/21/2023 | Hispanic Republicans of Texas | $3,373.37 | Text Messages re: Kira Sanchez/Kleberg County Event |
| 07/03/2023 | Carrasco, Aimee (Mrs.) | $1,200.00 | Paid via personal debit card $1200 towards the invoice from the consulting company. |
| 11/09/2022 | Zubeldia, Derek Lee (Mr.) | $3,944.15 | Consulting |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.