Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Gregg Abbott Campaign
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 135396 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$43,783.70
Client Filers
16
Payments
23
Activity Range
11/13/2001–10/24/2017
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 16 connected filers · 23 payments · $43,783.70 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Gregg Abbott Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
11 | 68.8% | 325 | 3.3% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
11 | 68.8% | 524 | 2.1% |
|
BRYAN HUGHES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 44066
|
10 | 62.5% | 230 | 4.2% |
|
LARRY TAYLOR CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 187090
|
9 | 56.3% | 155 | 5.6% |
|
CRAIG ESTES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 78091
|
9 | 56.3% | 163 | 5.3% |
|
ROBERT NICHOLS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 266292
|
9 | 56.3% | 197 | 4.4% |
|
JOSE MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169533
|
9 | 56.3% | 222 | 3.9% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
9 | 56.3% | 268 | 3.3% |
|
JEFF WENTWORTH CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 163721
|
8 | 50.0% | 116 | 6.5% |
|
BILL CALLEGARI CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 34515
|
8 | 50.0% | 133 | 5.7% |
|
BRANDON CREIGHTON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 40824
|
8 | 50.0% | 139 | 5.4% |
|
SID MILLER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 283997
|
8 | 50.0% | 147 | 5.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.