Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Grass Root Strategies
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 133468 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$169,283.85
Client Filers
6
Payments
53
Activity Range
04/09/2009–07/13/2012
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 6 connected filers · 53 payments · $169,283.85 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Grass Root Strategies
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $129,267.53 | 23 | 07/13/2012 |
| 2 | Anderson, Susan (Ms.) | $14,070.89 | 15 | 04/01/2010 |
| 3 | Snipes, Michael R. | $11,345.43 | 8 | 02/19/2010 |
| 4 | Butler, Richie L. | $6,500.00 | 1 | 01/23/2012 |
| 5 | Jordan, James R. | $6,100.00 | 4 | 12/21/2009 |
| 6 | Lopez, David (Mr.) | $2,000.00 | 2 | 06/25/2009 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FAR NORTH DALLAS DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 110414
|
5 | 83.3% | 62 | 7.9% |
|
DALLAS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 82606
|
5 | 83.3% | 304 | 1.6% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
5 | 83.3% | 1,669 | 0.3% |
|
REILLY ECHOLS PRINTING
Vendor ID 258755
|
4 | 66.7% | 146 | 2.7% |
|
T-Shirts Etc
Vendor ID 302704
|
3 | 50.0% | 5 | 37.5% |
|
American Campaign Signs & Graphics
Vendor ID 14347
|
3 | 50.0% | 25 | 10.7% |
|
Reilly Echols Printing Inc.
Vendor ID 258759
|
3 | 50.0% | 91 | 3.2% |
|
FAST SIGNS
Vendor ID 110821
|
3 | 50.0% | 302 | 1.0% |
|
TOM THUMB
Vendor ID 329748
|
3 | 50.0% | 300 | 1.0% |
|
KINKO'S
Vendor ID 179189
|
3 | 50.0% | 380 | 0.8% |
|
PARTY CITY
Vendor ID 238598
|
3 | 50.0% | 734 | 0.4% |
|
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
|
3 | 50.0% | 947 | 0.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $2,428.92 | Campaign consulting |
| 06/19/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $1,252.13 | Campaign consulting |
| 05/29/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $4,680.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 04/29/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $6,500.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 03/30/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $6,500.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 03/01/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $6,500.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 02/23/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $250.00 | Advertising |
| 02/01/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $10,000.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 01/23/2012 | Butler, Richie L. | $6,500.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 01/20/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $60.00 | luncheon tickets |
| 01/10/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $86.60 | reimbursement |
| 01/05/2012 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $10,000.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 12/22/2011 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $504.94 | Reimbursement |
| 12/01/2011 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $10,000.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 11/03/2011 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $10,000.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 10/04/2011 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $10,000.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 09/16/2011 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $5,000.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 08/29/2011 | Guerra Snelson, Teresa | $5,000.00 | Campaign consulting |
| 04/01/2010 | Anderson, Susan (Ms.) | $115.00 | Gala Ticket |
| 02/26/2010 | Anderson, Susan (Ms.) | $190.00 | Precinct Chair Dinner |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.