Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

GOOGLE ADS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 131710 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$77,828.08
Client Filers
29
Payments
244
Activity Range
09/27/2009–02/24/2026
Largest Payment
$2,560.00
Graph: 29 connected filers · 244 payments · $77,828.08 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Fair Shot Texas PAC$47,058.349709/29/2022
2Collin County Republican Party (CEC)$7,578.852112/05/2024
3Hopper, Stephen (Mr.)$7,425.992006/03/2024
4Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$3,755.581202/24/2026
5Hemphill, Sharon (Ms.)$1,550.00212/01/2020
6Markowitz, Elizabeth A. (Ms.)$1,257.27612/07/2018
7United to Protect GCISD$1,235.12406/03/2024
8Campolo, Allison Renee (Mrs.)$1,208.63603/07/2018
9Austin Fire Fighters PAC$1,009.68312/13/2019
10Talarico, James (The Honorable)$807.55806/05/2023
11Dahlberg, Julia E. (Mrs.)$676.17211/10/2022
12ChangeAustin.org$675.00412/06/2014
13Tom Schieffer for Governor Inc.$632.16512/19/2009
14Fierro, Martha E. (Mrs.)$384.53512/02/2024
15Chambers, Brandy K. (Mrs.)$359.321408/06/2020
16Collins II, Charles Leonard (Mr.)$310.40103/13/2018
17Meza, Velia J. (Ms.)$251.59103/22/2018
18Lewis, Jessica L. V. (Mrs.)$250.00205/30/2020
19Harle, Sid L. (The Honorable)$250.00102/12/2016
20MISD Success For All$226.48406/04/2022

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
19 65.5% 1,638 1.2%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
18 62.1% 3,017 0.6%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
16 55.2% 1,958 0.8%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
14 48.3% 1,174 1.2%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
14 48.3% 1,174 1.2%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
14 48.3% 1,876 0.7%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
13 44.8% 1,327 1.0%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
13 44.8% 1,669 0.8%
SHELL
Vendor ID 281652
10 34.5% 614 1.6%
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
10 34.5% 734 1.3%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
10 34.5% 1,077 0.9%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
10 34.5% 1,480 0.7%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
02/24/2026Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$500.00Digital advertising
02/22/2026Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$500.00Digital advertising
02/19/2026Flores, Benjamin (Mr.)$70.00Digital advertising
02/14/2026Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$500.00Digital advertising
01/20/2026Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$500.00Digital advertising
01/16/2026Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$500.00Digital advertising
01/12/2026Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$500.00Digital advertising
01/02/2026Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$27.07Digital advertising
12/30/2025Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$350.00Digital Advertising
12/18/2025Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$200.00Digital Advertising
12/01/2025Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$118.51Digital Advertising
11/18/2025Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$50.00Digital Advertising
11/14/2025Palmer, Nicholas D. (Mr.)$10.00Digital Advertising
12/05/2024Collin County Republican Party (CEC)$2,454.25Google Adds
12/04/2024Collin County Republican Party (CEC)$2,560.00Google adds
12/04/2024Collin County Republican Party (CEC)$960.00Google Adds
12/02/2024Fierro, Martha E. (Mrs.)$87.35Ads
11/07/2024Collin County Republican Party (CEC)$672.00Advertising
11/05/2024Fierro, Martha E. (Mrs.)$200.00Ads
11/05/2024Fierro, Martha E. (Mrs.)$50.00Ads
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.