Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

GO UNION PRINTING

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 130428 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$50,966.72
Client Filers
26
Payments
91
Activity Range
08/07/2012–11/17/2025
Largest Payment
$3,732.28
Graph: 26 connected filers · 91 payments · $50,966.72 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$14,866.611111/02/2022
2The Spring Democratic Club$6,946.13210/25/2024
3Milasincic, Adam (Mr.)$5,077.24801/16/2018
4Markowitz, Elizabeth A. (Ms.)$3,571.87703/04/2019
5Morris, Andrew D. (Mr.)$2,537.91403/20/2018
6Campolo, Allison Renee (Mrs.)$1,837.46301/08/2018
7Pacheco, Leo (Mr.)$1,537.24510/13/2020
8Davis, Pamela F. (Mrs.)$1,508.22702/22/2022
9Duffy, William Z. (Mr.)$1,490.16510/06/2017
10Bucy III, John (Mr.)$1,360.62408/13/2014
11Zwiener, Erin A. (Ms.)$1,310.50201/24/2018
12Cook, Molly C. (Ms.)$1,293.59410/29/2024
13Ervin, Thomas J. (Mr.)$1,292.68308/27/2019
14Holguin, Eric (Mr.)$1,157.45311/22/2019
15Gardner, Barbara J. (Ms.)$1,154.20310/29/2016
16Hays County Democratic Party Executive Committee (CEC)$1,029.93306/05/2020
17Johnson, Nathan M. (The Honorable)$527.66209/06/2025
18Hoffman, Martin (Mr.)$524.53209/30/2013
19Evans, Darrel$453.67106/15/2024
20Moore, Aaron J. A. (Mr.)$346.44404/07/2017

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
21 80.8% 3,017 0.7%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
19 73.1% 1,669 1.1%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
18 69.2% 1,638 1.1%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
13 50.0% 1,958 0.7%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
12 46.2% 1,536 0.8%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
12 46.2% 1,876 0.6%
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
11 42.3% 592 1.8%
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
11 42.3% 620 1.7%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
11 42.3% 1,174 0.9%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
10 38.5% 1,174 0.8%
NGP VAN
Vendor ID 225757
9 34.6% 252 3.3%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
9 34.6% 1,101 0.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/17/2025Wittliff, Herman A. (Mr.)$65.37Business Cards
09/06/2025Johnson, Nathan M. (The Honorable)$263.83Campaign printed materials
10/29/2024Cook, Molly C. (Ms.)$577.36Printing
10/25/2024The Spring Democratic Club$3,732.28Mailing
10/23/2024Cook, Molly C. (Ms.)$64.13Campaign business cards
07/03/2024Cook, Molly C. (Ms.)$587.97thank you cards
06/15/2024Evans, Darrel$453.67Flyers
11/02/2022Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$340.63Door Hangers
11/01/2022The Spring Democratic Club$3,213.85Bulk mail
10/26/2022Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$2,202.02signs for election
10/26/2022Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$757.46Signs for election
10/14/2022Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$752.93Signs
10/13/2022Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$2,041.20Signs for election
10/11/2022Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$1,509.38Signs for election
02/22/2022Davis, Pamela F. (Mrs.)$465.96Campaign literature
02/10/2022Davis, Pamela F. (Mrs.)$465.96Campaign literature
01/03/2022Davis, Pamela F. (Mrs.)$160.62Pushcards
11/10/2021Davis, Pamela F. (Mrs.)$104.92Campaign literature
10/26/2021Davis, Pamela F. (Mrs.)$102.92Thank you cards
10/13/2020Pacheco, Leo (Mr.)$185.67Re-order of 10,000 re-election cards.
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.