Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Go Creative
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 130276 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$1,369,397.01
Client Filers
4
Payments
23
Activity Range
01/18/2023–04/24/2026
Largest Payment
$350,000.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 23 payments · $1,369,397.01 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Go Creative
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $1,324,971.87 | 18 | 04/20/2026 |
| 2 | Eagles for Excellence | $32,800.00 | 2 | 04/24/2026 |
| 3 | Focus on Students GPAC | $7,765.26 | 2 | 06/30/2023 |
| 4 | Brissette, Lori Massey (Mrs.) | $3,859.88 | 1 | 02/13/2024 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
|
3 | 75.0% | 642 | 0.5% |
|
Valley Mart
Vendor ID 342364
|
2 | 50.0% | 20 | 9.1% |
|
ALAMO CITY REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 9469
|
2 | 50.0% | 81 | 2.4% |
|
Upstream Communications
Vendor ID 339858
|
2 | 50.0% | 100 | 2.0% |
|
MURPHY USA
Vendor ID 219982
|
2 | 50.0% | 189 | 1.0% |
|
GODADDY
Vendor ID 130494
|
2 | 50.0% | 514 | 0.4% |
|
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
|
2 | 50.0% | 734 | 0.3% |
|
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
|
2 | 50.0% | 620 | 0.3% |
|
SHELL
Vendor ID 281652
|
2 | 50.0% | 614 | 0.3% |
|
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
|
2 | 50.0% | 696 | 0.3% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
2 | 50.0% | 1,638 | 0.1% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
2 | 50.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $4,500.00 | digital ads |
| 04/02/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $3,500.00 | digital ads |
| 03/16/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $2,500.00 | digital ads |
| 02/23/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $85,000.00 | digital ads |
| 02/21/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $85,000.00 | digital advertising |
| 02/09/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $350,000.00 | digital advertising |
| 02/09/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $17,811.87 | digital advertising |
| 01/20/2026 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $350,000.00 | digital advertising buy |
| 12/08/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $7,541.25 | digital services |
| 11/10/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $7,541.25 | digital services |
| 10/08/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $26,330.00 | digital services |
| 09/15/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $22,541.25 | digital services |
| 06/13/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $2,541.25 | digital consulting |
| 05/14/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $2,541.25 | digital consulting |
| 04/04/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $2,541.25 | digital consulting |
| 03/03/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $2,541.25 | digital consulting |
| 02/20/2025 | Wright, James D. (The Honorable) | $2,541.25 | digital consulting |
| 02/13/2024 | Brissette, Lori Massey (Mrs.) | $3,859.88 | advertising expense |
| 06/30/2023 | Focus on Students GPAC | $7,364.73 | Consulting. |
| 01/18/2023 | Focus on Students GPAC | $400.53 | Website. |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.